So, now you have brought it over here?
I will gladly say that these same people you list do NOT mention your name likewise, although they could.
Why do you intend on starting trouble?
Prior to their arrival, when we disagreed we debated and required the other side to provide links and/or cites to back up their assertions. When I first arrived here I was taken to task for my support of asset forfeiture in it's current form by Jim Robinson, OWK, tpaine and others. It got warm, but never was I flamed. I would make a point and they would counter. I was wrong in my positions for a number of reasons. It bagan to become clear to me that on that issue I was out of step with my positions on other Constitutional issues, after a time I came to understand this fact and modify my position(s) on asset forfeiture. Always those individuals responded with logic and humor - never invective and personal insults.
That debate would never occur today on FR, because the afore-mentioned individuals, when confronted with a tough call intellectually, fold up their tents and resort to distortion, distraction and just outright flames. Do I have a tendancy to pop off now and then? Yes - with those posters. But I don't suffer fools lightly and they try every ounce of my patience. Which is why I ignore them now.
Sorry if you don't like the facts, but that is what they are. BTW - That response you quoted wasn't "bringing something over here," it was a response to a question to another poster. So if you don't like my post, at least have the decency not to mischaracterize it - refute it with facts and logic.
That's rich, coming from you! lol
How do you post that with a straight face?