Posted on 02/01/2024 11:23:36 AM PST by algore
CONWAY, S.C. (WPDE) — The couple accused of burning a cross facing their Black neighbor's home could soon be kicked out of their residence outside of Conway.
Fifteenth Circuit Solicitor Jimmy Richardson asked an Horry County court to declare Worden Butler and Alexis Hartnett's residence along Corbett Drive a public nuisance.
Butler and Harnett face several charges and are being federally investigated for potential civil rights violations after police said they erected and burned a cross over the Thanksgiving holiday as a means to intimidate their neighbors, Shawn and Monica Williams.
James Battle, a special prosecutor who handles nuisance actions for the solicitor’s office, filed the petition on January 26. That was paired with a temporary injunction or restraining order that would remove the couple from the home sooner.
Richardson's additional request for a temporary injunction would remove all residents from the home and close it until the case can be heard in court. If the court declares the house a nuisance, the couple could be removed from the home for one year.
Richardson could oust the couple by using a state law that allows authorities to shut down businesses that become hot spots for crime or havens for prostitution and drugs.
The law also allows solicitors to address nuisances that stem from a “continuous breach of the peace,” and that’s how the petition describes the Corbett Drive home. The document details the cross burning, threats and slurs.
Richardson's office wrote in the Summons that the residence has had a "general reputation" for breaching the peace.
(Excerpt) Read more at wpde.com ...
Klan defenders on FR? Let’s hear from you guys. January White Sale ought to have been good for costumage.
Calling for the death of all Jews is considered virtuous as well.
Likewise, calling for the death of all White people is considered virtuous.
And sodomy in the senate chamber.
"First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people."
Did they do this or is this another voluntary act of self-racism?
While I would argue that these idiots are being unfairly targeted and that I would acquit them as a juror, I would also not lose a minutes sleep over their self-inflicted problems.
Good riddance to them.
Burning a cross was done to intimidate the neighbors. That is a hate crime. Again, kick them to the curb, run them out of town. Good riddance.
How many times does someone beat up a white person because they are white and not charged with a hate crime? That is the ultimate form of intimidation.
“Burning a cross was done to intimidate the neighbors. That is a hate crime. Again, kick them to the curb, run them out of town. Good riddance.”
Let’s avoid subjecting them to the same treatment as the January 6th protesters.
I understand the concern about hate crimes, and agree that acts like burning a cross, often seen as a symbol of intimidation and racism, are deeply troubling. If an act is done with the intent to threaten or intimidate, it’s rightfully subject to legal scrutiny and action.
However, it’s essential to adhere to the principles of due process and the rule of law. In our legal system, everyone is entitled to a fair trial and legal representation. This ensures that justice is served correctly and in accordance with the law, rather than through immediate, extrajudicial actions
If what you’re suggesting is that there should be due process before declaring the house a nuisance I’d agree. Given the fact that the article and others suggest that Butler and Harnett “face several charges” and that they’re under federal investigation on suspicion of hate crimes the nuisance issue may not be their biggest problem.
You make a good point. After the DOJ gets through with them, they’ll be locked up (and out of their home) for longer than a year.
“If what you’re suggesting is that there should be due process before declaring the house a nuisance I’d agree.”
Your point is well taken. Due process is indeed crucial in any legal matter, including the declaration of a property as a nuisance. It’s important that Butler and Harnett’s rights are respected throughout this process.
As you mentioned, if they are facing multiple charges and are under federal investigation for suspicion of hate crimes, these issues are indeed severe and potentially more pressing than the nuisance declaration.
That’s what I think, federal hate crime can put them away for ten years. Hope they can sell the home for enough to pay their attorneys.
Theres 2 sides to every story, You have no clue what the neighbors put these people thru since they moved in. otoh, they should thank God they dont have an HOA, the HOA would not approve!
see post 18. The white guilt on FR is spreading
Due process is Constitutionally guaranteed.
Hate Crimes? Not so much. A modern made-up feel-good notion.
If I’m intimidated or shot, it shouldn’t matter whether the intimidator hates me or not. Burning a cross on your own lawn is different than burning one on your neighbor’s lawn.
If I simply say “I hate your guts!” is that a “hate crime?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.