No mention of what state this is in the title or first sentence.
Just point out in other “religious texts” where homosexuality is discouraged. They will want to ban them too. It’s just the faggots that hate the Bible.
I wonder how many people actually would pick up a Bible in a “school” library. But regardless of that, prophecy right before your eyes, “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears...”.
Maranatha!
Satan? I mean Dems?
If they are banned and removed make it a point to go in each week and place a copy somewhere in the library. Quiet revolution, the Lords word shall not be stopped.
Too many wannabe ‘journalists’ and other attention whores give traction to this stupidity.
The response to “Somebody” is simple - ‘pound sand’.
It’s one of the most influential books in history, it belongs in a library. End of discussion.
Does that mean the Koran will be banned too?
Tit for tat. Really mature.</sarc>
Is this the case where a bunch of books got banned for having talking animals, sexual content and so on based on House Bill 374... And a parent filed the petition on the basis that the Bible has all those things in it too?
https://www.sltrib.com/news/education/2023/03/22/utah-parent-says-bible-contains/
As I understand it, the claim is based on the Bible containing,
“... Incest, onanism, bestiality, prostitution, genital mutilation, fellatio, dildos, rape and even infanticide”
Eight Bible verses have been cited in evidence.
Banning books on the basis of poorly defined subjective bases, with no clarification of the content guidelines is never a good idea in a free society. Someone invariably trolls the rules by exploiting gaps, inconsistencies and open goals.
This is a bit like when the UK didn’t define the criteria for a serious ship naming competition... and Boaty McBoatFace” won.