So the guy is at fault if he doesn't agree to be a complete spineless cuck? How about if he - after this horrendous betrayal - feels as though he cannot be a good father to a child that is the product of his wife's betrayal?
Monstrous is cheating on your spouse. Even more monstrous is using your spouse for years by making them think this child is theirs when it is not. Its not "just genetics" as you would have it. There's a lot more to this story than that. This isn't remotely the same as adopting a child. That is not a betrayal. That you undertake voluntarily. That's totally different from this.
To take this position you assume that after five years of rearing, loving, caring, nurturing, teaching, etc. that a person could just- click- totally betray the little boy no matter what the circumstances of his creation were- the father’s beef with the mother is not related to the father being a father- that little boy is still his son in every way but genetics- the father could have adopted him and together they could have had a great life.
You keep talking about the dad being a cuck if he kept his son- that’s your view
I’d say he’s a godly man and hero for being Christ like and staying true to the relationship he was building with the child. I like my version better than yours.
A version like yours won the day but it was not the best for either of them- in my version the father is a heroe not an abandoner of a precious little boy.