To take this position you assume that after five years of rearing, loving, caring, nurturing, teaching, etc. that a person could just- click- totally betray the little boy no matter what the circumstances of his creation were- the father’s beef with the mother is not related to the father being a father- that little boy is still his son in every way but genetics- the father could have adopted him and together they could have had a great life.
You keep talking about the dad being a cuck if he kept his son- that’s your view
I’d say he’s a godly man and hero for being Christ like and staying true to the relationship he was building with the child. I like my version better than yours.
A version like yours won the day but it was not the best for either of them- in my version the father is a heroe not an abandoner of a precious little boy.
You see it as betraying the kid. I don’t. The betrayal was when the wife cheated with another man then used this poor guy by telling him it was his kid. The mother and her f*** buddy the real father are the ones you need to blame for betrayal. The husband is not the father.
Not.
The husband could have adopted him but he’s under no obligation legal or moral to do so. That child has a father. Where is he? He needs to come take responsibility.
You say it’s my view the husband would be a cuck to accept this. That’s not just my view. Those are the facts. The wife cheated. That’s another man’s child.
You say it was not the best for either of them. It’s a horrible situation but the husband may well feel that what’s best for him is to move on with his life and maybe start a family of his own. Who is anyone else to judge him in the awful situation he was put in by his wife’s betrayal? He didn’t abandon the child according to Chinese law. It was never his.