Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Side effects of synthetic oestrogen have been passed on to daughters and granddaughters since the 1940s in 'scandal worse than Thalidomide'
daily mail ^

Posted on 01/02/2022 8:57:34 PM PST by algore

Generations of women last night demanded an urgent inquiry into a drug they call the 'silent Thalidomide'.

A synthetic oestrogen known as Diethylstilbestrol (DES) was given to pregnant women to prevent miscarriage – and to dry up breast milk. But it has since been linked to a raft of health conditions including cancer, infertility and early menopause.

A Daily Mail investigation today lays bare the devastating impact of this little-known drug which has ravaged the bodies of three generations of British women since 1940.

Marion McMillan, 73, was given DES 50 years ago to dry up her breast milk after she was forced to give up her baby for adoption. The mother-of-three now has terminal cancer.

She said: 'I think it's worse than Thalidomide because your subsequent children and grandchildren could be affected.'

Incredibly, DES is still used to treat prostate cancer and post-menopausal breast cancer. MPs and victims last night called for an investigation into DES and a public awareness campaign to identify victims.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
fortunately experimental gene therapy is good for you
1 posted on 01/02/2022 8:57:34 PM PST by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: algore

But just trust us.... this experimental jab is perfectly safe.


2 posted on 01/02/2022 9:01:34 PM PST by imabadboy99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kalee

for later


3 posted on 01/02/2022 9:04:19 PM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

But the world population just keeps growing and growing. Now there are 8 Billion of us. Just 100 years ago it was less than 3 Billion?


4 posted on 01/02/2022 9:06:25 PM PST by entropy12 (President Trump was the best president in my life time of 81 years and counting..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/medical-treatments/des-exposure.html

“Other than in a rare clinical trial, DES is no longer available in the United States for use in humans.”


5 posted on 01/02/2022 9:07:23 PM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kalee

Need to be careful not to confuse people about synthetic vs natural estrogen. 30 years ago the dangers of synthetic E were well known. Natural estrogen was and I believe still is an important treatment to prevent miscarriage in women with low estrogen. When I researched it at the time the only effect of natural E was the children tended to have slightly higher IQ. My daughter would never have been born alive without natural estrogen supplements.


6 posted on 01/02/2022 9:16:46 PM PST by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Why are you for science? You won’t be popular that way.


7 posted on 01/02/2022 9:26:28 PM PST by entropy12 (President Trump was the best president in my life time of 81 years and counting..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

You don’t seriously think every woman on the planet took this


8 posted on 01/02/2022 9:35:03 PM PST by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: algore

I am a DES baby. When I was in my twenties I got a very strange call. We had known my mother was given this drug during pregnancy but what we didn’t know that her OB-GYN for me prescribed it more than any other doctor in this country. In Lincoln, NE.

So I was exposed to it at 5 weeks in utero how did I find out? That strange phone call was that doctor’s office tracking down all former patients to inform them.

The drug was given to women threatening to miscarry. My mother NEVER had any such issues. This doctor just gave it routinely. So my older brother, me and my younger sister were all exposed. We all had issues reproductively and other things I believe can be directly traced. I won’t go into detail. My brother and sister were able to have children but not without some very serious scenarios.

So anyone who doesn’t think this was a big deal think again.

They were having to remove vaginas surgically in some young women. It appeared to affect girls worse but it affected boys too. Trust me I’ll never forget the terrible guilt my mother went through for something she wasn’t even consulted for in being given that drug. And the fear we all went through for years.


9 posted on 01/02/2022 10:27:11 PM PST by BlueHorseShoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueHorseShoe

At least the doctor’s office called patients to inform them.


10 posted on 01/02/2022 11:39:31 PM PST by NetAddicted ( Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

26 years later.

My mother only knew it was given with my little sister but then we found out worse it was for me and my brother and for me way earlier in utero.

26 years after the fact isn’t heroic. It was something else.


11 posted on 01/02/2022 11:58:49 PM PST by BlueHorseShoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: algore

My mom was given something to dry up her breast milk after she had me. She said it didn’t work either.

She died of breast cancer that metastasized when she was in her mid 60’s and I always wondered if there was a connection, because I’m pretty sure they did it for all five of her pregnancies.

Since I’m the oldest, it would not affect me, but it may my sisters. They never had kids, though so any damage done would be limited.


12 posted on 01/03/2022 1:14:44 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roving

Some people don’t think. Seriously.


13 posted on 01/03/2022 1:16:08 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: algore
fortunately experimental gene therapy is good for you

You should know that fifty years ago there was no such thing as gene therapy.

14 posted on 01/03/2022 2:23:43 AM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueHorseShoe

My guess is it wasn’t altruism; it wss probably legally required.


15 posted on 01/03/2022 3:42:29 AM PST by NetAddicted ( Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BlueHorseShoe

DES was given to pregnant women until 1971. The medical community wasn’t aware of the side effects until some women who were in utero when the DES was administered, started developing a ‘new’ cancer called Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma.

I worked in a large teaching hospital in the late 70s-early 80s, where a research project was started in the Cytology Lab to study DES daughters.Then it was discovered that DES sons were at higher risk for prostate and testicular cancer. So DES sons started being checked earlier.

Please know that the risk was not known when the DES was given. When it was discovered that there were side effects for the children, the drug was abandoned for the use in pregnant women. If you check, I’m sure you can find research projects at various hospitals, where you can be followed closely. Prayers for your health.


16 posted on 01/03/2022 3:45:29 AM PST by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: algore

Bump to try to analyze later.


17 posted on 01/03/2022 3:48:21 AM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom
It still amazes me that women back in the day, my own mother included, actually believed the pediatricians who convinced them that a factory-made substance called formula was better for their babies than their own breast milk.

Or maybe they just wanted to believe it to escape the inconvenience of breastfeeding.

18 posted on 01/03/2022 5:39:55 AM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: algore

My ex had this given to her after our first two babies. She had menopause at 35.


19 posted on 01/03/2022 5:53:16 AM PST by rfreedom4u ("You may all go to hell and I will go to Texas")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

My mom told me she wanted to nurse but the doctor said to her “You’re not going to breast feed, are you?!”

And she caved.

I can’t help but wonder how much of my food allergy issues I am dealing with at this point, are connected to that decision. I don’t blame her. She did what she thought was best and didn’t know any better. But I made darned sure I breastfed my kids and while they have some allergies, none of them are dealing yet with the degree of it that I am. However, at their age, I wasn’t either. It’s only as I got older that it really became a problem.

I nursed my kids for a long time, too. Well past the 4 months before introducing solid foods the medical community advocated. The doctor kept telling me they were doing well on solid food and I’d just smile and nod.

They started on solid food when they could pick it up and put it in their mouths themselves, just about the time teeth were starting to come in. I figured that was naturally the appropriate timing.


20 posted on 01/03/2022 6:55:16 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson