Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Short-term Reactions Among Pregnant and Lactating Individuals in the First Wave of the COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout
jama ^

Posted on 08/17/2021 8:39:18 PM PDT by algore

Research has found that COVID-19 is associated with adverse events in pregnancy, and recommendations therefore include offering SARS-CoV-2 vaccines to pregnant and lactating individuals, despite their lack of inclusion in initial clinical trials.

To date, limited data on vaccine and pregnancy outcomes exist for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pregnancy and lactation.

The objective of this study was to investigate experiences of pregnant and lactating individuals after receiving COVID-19 vaccines.

Individuals who were recruited and enrolled online in the UW COVID-19 Vaccine in Pregnancy and Lactation Registry using chain-referral and snowball sampling

As of March 16, 2021, the study included 17 525 individuals (17 364 [99.7%] were women)

Among pregnant participants, any obstetrical symptoms were reported by 346 of 7809 individuals (4.4%) after the first dose and 484 of 6444 individuals (7.5%) after the second dose.

Altogether, 6586 pregnant individuals (84.3%) had reported a second vaccine dose at the time of data analysis.

Of these, 6244 individuals (94.8%) were still pregnant, while 288 individuals (4.3%) had delivered and 49 individuals (0.7%) reported miscarriages at the time of their second vaccine dose.

Among lactating individuals, interrupted breastfeeding after vaccination was reported by 155 of 6815 individuals after the first dose (2.3%) and 130 of 6056 individuals after the second dose (2.2%),

decreased milk supply for less than 24 hours by 339 individuals after the first dose (5.0%) and 434 individuals after the second dose (7.2%), and concerns about the infant after vaccination by 208 individuals after the first dose (3.0%) and 267 individuals after the second dose (4.4%).


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: covid; pregnancy; pregnant; vaccines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 08/17/2021 8:39:18 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: algore

As of March 16, 2021, the study included 17 525 individuals (17 364 [99.7%] were women) WTH???


2 posted on 08/17/2021 8:41:27 PM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. P144:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

“Individuals”?


3 posted on 08/17/2021 8:43:02 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Truth is hate speech to those who hate the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

It is for population control studies it seems. Giant lab with women as guinea pigs.


4 posted on 08/17/2021 8:43:05 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

“As of March 16, 2021, the study included 17 525 individuals (17 364 [99.7%] were women)”

Hmmmm What were the .3%?


5 posted on 08/17/2021 8:43:09 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Weren’t Fauci and his crew advocating for pregnant women to get the shot, just recently?


6 posted on 08/17/2021 8:49:04 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Could the vaccine have long term impacts for the immune system and post-birth development of the baby?

These questions were not asked or investigated.

That means journalists can now say “THERE IS NO EVIDENCE” that the vaccines might impact a baby’s immune system or development, because they never studied it at all.

That’s how modern malpractice journalism works


7 posted on 08/17/2021 8:51:00 PM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=zH7EL1meZhM&feature=emb_logo


8 posted on 08/17/2021 8:54:42 PM PDT by algore ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic
Hmmmm What were the .3%?

The tiny 0.3% must've been women who think they're men.

9 posted on 08/17/2021 8:55:23 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: algore

They really want to get this poison into everyone. There are so-called Twitter MDs who concentrate on how safe it is for pregnant women and safe for the babies. One thread I ran across a while ago started off with, “Tell us your pregnancy story if you’ve had the vaccine” and every single post was how wonderful it was, how healthy and robust their babies were and all had a pic of said baby.

The same “MD” also posts stories about pregnant women who died with Covid after giving birth, never being able to hold their precious baby.

Someone is paying big bucks for this social media propaganda.


10 posted on 08/17/2021 8:56:18 PM PDT by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame

Its twitter. The truth is banned


11 posted on 08/17/2021 9:15:46 PM PDT by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chode

‘chest feeders’, no doubt


12 posted on 08/17/2021 9:17:14 PM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=50%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

I caught that too. Apparently the AMA has gone woke.


13 posted on 08/17/2021 11:14:40 PM PDT by Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

For your file


14 posted on 08/17/2021 11:19:39 PM PDT by algore ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

“Individuals”?”

From jama? It’s enough to make you want to throw up!

Maybe life under the taliban ain’t so bad. At least they’re still in touch with reality.


15 posted on 08/17/2021 11:45:19 PM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cathi; Unrepentant VN Vet; metmom; Fractal Trader; SecAmndmt; bagster; doc maverick; ...

PING


16 posted on 08/17/2021 11:46:02 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore
As of March 16, 2021, the study included 17 525 individuals (17 364 [99.7%] were women)

Lost all credibility right there.

17 posted on 08/18/2021 1:16:05 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

The 0.3% were women too, mentally-ill women who can’t figure out their own sex.


18 posted on 08/18/2021 5:34:42 AM PDT by Pollster1 (America is no longer in Claire Wolfe's "awkward stage")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: algore

Anecdotal, but the first pregnant woman I knew of that took the vaxx was the daughter in law of a friend. DTL and her husband actually work for Pfizer

She had a horrible labor that culminated in an emergency C section. During the surgery she hemorrhaged so badly that she ended up with a hysterectomy. Mom and baby were both touch and go, but thankfully ok in the end.

The OB said that in over 30 years of medicine he had never encountered uncontrollable bleeding this severe.

The saddest part of this story is that our friends (who both had Covid) are still not allowed to see the baby because they are not vaccinated.


19 posted on 08/18/2021 6:02:35 AM PDT by Mygirlsmom (Back after a long hiatus. Now mygrandkidsgrandma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mygirlsmom

Dear God!


20 posted on 08/18/2021 6:48:07 AM PDT by WhattheDickens? (Funny, I didn’t think this was 1984…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson