Posted on 07/12/2021 8:36:33 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
Public Health England just released a new report showing that at least 62 percent of all deaths associated with the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) are occurring in people who were already “vaccinated.”
The news just so happened to come out the same day that the mainstream media ran a distraction story about British politician Matt Hancock having a secret affair with his aide Gina Coladangelo.
Many people missed it the day it broke, in other words, but now it is circulating the web and causing many to question whether the jabs are truly safe and effective as the government claims.
Fresh data out of the U.K. shows that injected people are three times more likely to die from the so-called “delta variant” than people who left their immune systems and DNA alone by just saying no, as Nancy Reagan once said, to dangerous drugs...
(Excerpt) Read more at humansarefree.com ...
I am the absolute authority on what my own point is, and that is not it, Cathy Newman.
The sensational blog doesn’t provide a link to the actual article or the report.
When I read the report Friday it said that was a one week snapshot for the UK.
It’s just an effort to stir emotions in the ignorant.
Understood. What you are saying is that the sample size of 144 deaths (showing a 55/40 ratio of deaths vaccinated to unvaccinated) is a small sample size but the sample size of infections showing the vaccines effective against hospitalizations is a large sample size.
Makes sense.
indicating that the vax immunity starts waning enough after 6 months to put them at risk of re-infection.
= = =
Or maybe the ‘backdoor’ of the vax takes 6 months to kick in.
they are not dying with Covid.
The test being used is a POS that delivers false positives.
PCR was not meant to be a sole determinant of anything and when you turn the cycle rate for testing from 20-25 all they way up to 40 cycles you are going to get a positive hit for something that is tested to the trillionoth level for an artifact that is clinically dead.
Kary Mullis inventor of the PCT test:
https://youtu.be/vaMZ4NyNCwI
Jason Hommel, a prolific writer and researcher and also the author of the very important article regarding coronavirus testing entitled “Scientists Say the COVID19 Test Kits Do Not Work, Are Worthless, and Give Impossible Results”:
“PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome. The problem is the test is known not to work. It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analysed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery. Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.”
an article also by Celia Farber, David Crowe, “a Canadian researcher with a degree in biology and mathematics and host of “The Infectious Myth” podcast, also the president of the think-tank Rethinking AIDS, also clearly explained the problems with the PCR based coronavirus testing, “revealing a world of unimaginable complexity, as well as trickery”:
“The first thing to know is that the test is not binary. In fact, I don’t think there are any tests for infectious disease that are positive or negative. What they do is they take some kind of a continuum and they arbitrarily say this point is the difference between positive and negative.”
He continued:
“PCR is really a manufacturing technique. You start with one molecule. You start with a small amount of DNA and on each cycle the amount doubles, which doesn’t sound like that much, but if you, if you double 30 times, you get approximately a billion times more material than you started with. So as a manufacturing technique, it’s great. What they do is they attach a fluorescent molecule to the RNA as they produce it. You shine a light at one wavelength, and you get a response, you get light sent back at a different wavelength. So, they measure the amount of light that comes back and that’s their surrogate for how much DNA there is. I’m using the word DNA. There’s a step in RT- PCR test which is where you convert the RNA to DNA. So, the PCR test is actually not using the viral RNA. It’s using DNA, but it’s like the complimentary RNA. So logically it’s the same thing, but it can be confusing. Like why am I suddenly talking about DNA? Basically, there’s a certain number of cycles.”
also from interview by Celia Farber, Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist, protease developer and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics, stated:
“You have to have a whopping amount of any organism to cause symptoms. Huge amounts of it. You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine. 30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms”
Asked by Farber what his advice for people who want to be tested for COVID-19, he replied:
“Don’t do it, I say, when people ask me. No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable. Every time somebody takes a swab, a tissue sample of their DNA, it goes into a government database. It’s to track us. They’re not just looking for the virus. Please put that in your article.”
He added:
“PCR for diagnosis is a big problem. When you have to amplify it these huge numbers of time, it’s going to generate massive amounts of false positives. Again, I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true.”
To understand more about PCR, we suggest you read more of Celia Farber’s article here:
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus
More references:
https://revealingfraud.com/2020/03/health/test-kits-do-not-work/
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/blog/coronavirus-hoax-jan-2020
A Breakdown on Current Testing Procedures
https://youtu.be/Xr8Dy5mnYx8
People are being conned by the BioPharma Industrial Complex
Moderna will have a $19 billion profit this year as a direct result of this contrived disease or overhyped crap.
Right? Must be bodies everywhere. Just can’t see ‘em.
So sorry for your loss.
And there seems to be nothing that will convince many not to get the vax. Many will not even read or hear about the people who are dying from these shots. So sad and it galls me that alternatives to a vax is never, ever an option in the presence of doctors.
My Doc put me on Quercetin, D3, Zinc, C, NAC
I think there is a chance Quercetin is what really helps and people might not know it.
VITT is the Achilles Heel of an otherwise great vaccine. The good news is an Israeli company has come up with a test to predict VITT, and also to treat those suffering from it. Those who test positive- a very tiny minority, should stay away from the vaccine (product not available for general use yet).
“Only people over 75 should even contemplate it.”
I disagree! NOBODY should take it!
Certainly NOT the elderly. Elderly people are usually more frail, have comorbidity issues. A reaction to the jab (s) is MORE likely to kill them.
Why take the chance when you have a 98% chance of surviving COVID? IF you get it. (You can’t die from COVID if you never get it)
How many elderly are on blood thinners to help prevent STROKES? Why in hell should they take something that is known to cause STROKES!?
The vaccines are UNNECESSARY! Therapeutics can minimize, prevent, CURE COVID.
NO ONE SHOULD GET A mRNA JAB! NO ONE!
👍🏼 Thx
You are right. God knows what all that DNA in it has been designed to do to us.
That's a big assumption. You could also assume that for equal numbers of infected unvaccinated and infected vaccinated, 3x more vaccinated die. Assuming one or the other is pointless. Unless the story specifies one case or another, the statistics are almost useless.
... “Quercetin, D3, Zinc, C...”
And now B12 is getting attention also.
I take ALL of those and more.
NO mRNA JAB for me!
I also believe that the wife and I had COVID (mild case) back in Jan 2020. Immune? Maybe.
😲
I am not criticizing you but look at Technical briefing 16 vs technical briefing 17 (this one).
They added age buckets at 50 y/o makes it look like everyone over 50 becomes functionally immune on their 50th birthday. Something is weird with this data.
Not even close.
You focus on what you want to say, and I'll be in charge of what I want to say.
I went through the Table 4 numbers in post #72.
Sample size is 92,029 total cases.
50 deaths out of 7,235 two-dose vaccinated cases.
44 deaths out of 53,822 unvaccinated cases.
Much lower % of deaths amongst the unvaccinated.
Not shocked at all. This was predicted and you have to have your eyes open to see it.
A person cannot live in denial.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.