So why don’t you pull it up and prove you’re not bearing false witness?
***
I did, heretic Ebb.
Post 58 in this thread, I provided the link and the quotes to your heretical condemnation of St. Paul’s teaching.
I quote again:
“freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3608661/posts?q=1&;page=251
Post 267, I quote:
Me: St. Paul says that salvation is by faith, not works, so that no one can boast.
You: No. Only the heretic Martin Luther, and his fellow travelers state that; and Luther’s no saint.
I quote St. Paul now.
“27 Then what becomes of our boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? By a law of works? No, but by the law of faith. 28 For we hold that one is justified by faith apart from works of the law.”
and
” For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, 9 not a result of works, so that no one may boast.”
You called St. Paul a heretic by describing what he preached as coming from heretics, and none of your denials or weasel-words will change that.”
You are self-condemned, heretic Ebb.
What part of my "No" do you not understand?
And how do you equate the above statement with your false witness that I'm calling St Paul a heretic?