Posted on 07/14/2013 3:53:35 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
You are right. I thought you said psycho but schizo will do. There are many glaring false premises, such as this happened on a “public thoroughfare”? No, it was inside a private gated community and George was a block watch captain there. Travon did not establish any right to be there. He was not derailed in his passage through the place. George had the right to ask him what he was up to.
Next, Defendant did NOT admit Travon committed no crime. When he bull rushed George and broke his nose he committed a felony, way before the gun came out.
The giving of platforms to these clowns is outrageous
“The defense and prosecution agreed that Martin did not commit a crime, was not even suspected of a crime, and was on a public thoroughfare when he was killed...”
Hey, the evidence - as presented in court and used by the jury - would indicate that Martin DID commit a crime. His attack on Zimmerman is “Aggravated Assault.” Zimmerman was retreating and - it is obvious to me - that Martin viciously attacked Martin and used unnecessary force to the point that Zimmerman was placed in the unenviable position of having to resort to deadly force to defend himself against a large, muscular 17 year old man-boy that was beating him without mercy. Martin had the rational option to run away...he did not...he chose to attack Zimmerman who was retreating.
There is NO violation of federal civil rights in the case by George Zimmerman. However, Trayvon Martin DID violate Mr. Zimmerman’s rights.
President Obama and AG Holder are both insufferable asses if they (to use what one key player said) turn a “tradigy into a travesty.”
This case of OVER and it needs to be dropped. Those that keep stirring this up are insurrectionists and quite possibly enemies of the state, and should be treated as such.
Oh, and our - never let an opportunity to politicism - POTUS is now using this case as a call for more suppression of 2nd Ammendment rights.
Was Damion “Football” Williams prosecuted for civil rights charges for smashing the head of a white truck driver?
Still if I were GZ, I’d take this opportunity to see the world, find a nice place to live as an ex-pat for 10 or 15 years.
This article is so full of crap it violates EPA regulations.
Wow. Telling a person he is going to die and then knocking that person to the ground and beating his head on a concrete sidewalk in order to make good on the promise is not a crime in Florida. I think I shall check to see if it is okay in California.
You’d think that if Holder filed civil rights charges or Martin’s family brought a wrongful death suit, either one, the jury in either of those cases would get to hear all the ^^^^ which was disallowed for this trial, including Martin punching out a school bus driver and being suspended from school for having burglary tools and women’s jewelry in his locker...
Earl Ofari Hutchinson
First go though the slander lawsuits and get the money. Then, change name, lose the weight, get some minor plastic surgery. Go out west and hide out for a couple of years on a small ranch / farm. Start a new life as a college student in a small college. Perhaps after 2 to 4 years he can then enter a profession and re-enter society as someone else.
Meanwhile the democrats are chattering about the need for stronger laws against racial profiling. (Also something the government has no authority over in the private lives of Americans)
Right ! Trayvon was a saint !
Ask his mom ! Ask his dad !
Then go to :The Curious Case Of Trayvon Martin's Backpack With Stolen Jewelry
at : http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3042856/posts
St tray wouldn't do drugs , commit assault, be involved with MMA punches , or intiate an assault
but whatever you do , don't check out his cell phone with a double stealth password ,
which assure ownership and usage !
It might destroy the political and especially the media version of St Tray that we have all seen on TV ...
..and find the real human being turning into a thug and a criminal!
that his parents never knew !!
This civil right was violated the moment Zimmerman presumed that a young black man walking on public sidewalk had committed a crime.
Yeah.
Part stupid and part dumb.
touche...
Probably some of the same phonies who were babbling: “If you see something, say something,” only a few short months ago.
I didn’t read the entire long article, but acting as if Trayvon’s freedom of movement in a public place was violated is nonsense. He moved freely all around the complex and then turned back and confronted Zimmerman of his own volition.
GZ claimed self defense and a jury agreed. All one needs to ask ones self is who was George defending himself from?
Too many words. This article could be summed up as, check your intelligence at the door and remember trayvon was black and Zimmerman is sort of white.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.