True that.
***Then your entire point is rendered moot by your own admission.
But he alleges to have developed the first commercially viable large scale implementation.
***Then take it up on a Rossi thread.
Tired of this convo.
***Again. This thread is not about Rossi.
If you don’t understand the impact Rossi has had on this tech and its credibility in many circles, mostly bad but some good in terms of exposure, there is no point to it.
***Then, again: your own point is rendered moot. Before Rossi, 90% of the LENR research was in Palladium/Deuterium, now most of it is in Nickel/Hydrogen. It would appear that you don’t understand that impact.
Then, again: your own point is rendered moot. Before Rossi, 90% of the LENR research was in Palladium/Deuterium, now most of it is in Nickel/Hydrogen. It would appear that you don’t understand that impact.
Seriously, an article about open source research re: LENR involving Nickel/Hydrogen has nothing to do with Rossi when, as you stated, "Before Rossi, 90% of the LENR research was in Palladium/Deuterium, now most of it is in Nickel/Hydrogen"?! Believe it or not, we're on the same side. For some reason, though, you got upset when I brought up Rossi's (good? bad? dunno) influence on this research. I think you must have misinterpreted something I said.