[2ndDivisionVet]

Comments?

The author

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

A list of who should not be armed (in a Kennesaw, GA situation) needs to take several things into account.

To start with, there are those that religiously or philosophically refuse to bear arms. And this passivity or pacifism should be respected on its face, but should not be honored beyond that, because they are demanding that others protect and defend them.

And there are many who though not mentally ill, have and know they have such a weak or neurotic disposition that they are just unable to handle guns. This also applies to some combat vets with PTSD.

And there are many who for whatever reason are so irresponsible they cannot be trusted, or cannot trust themselves, to have anything of value on their person, as they would lose their gun, misplace it, forget that they have it, and that sort of thing.

[Clock King]

Black Fascist. Just say it and stop being afraid to say so.

[Marcella]

This Earl Morgan, the liberal pos, uses a liberal tact of taking a reasonable statement and flipping it into an outrageous statement. I really can't stand people who do this.

I have heard every single exchange between Piers Morgan and LaPierre. How could I do this? Simple, you can't do it because you have a life - I don't have a life, so I listen to news all day and into the night and read news at the same time.

LaPierre makes the point to Piers that the second amendment guarantees the government will not infringe on the God given freedom of people to arm themselves.

Then, this Earl Morgan flips that and says LaPierre wants everyone to be armed and go around shooting people. Just discount this pos for the pos he is.

I also heard every word today during the senate hearing about gun control. LaPierre says criminals won't undergo a background check - they will get their guns another way. So, the liberal senators on the committee get all upset because they say a background check will keep the bad guys from getting guns. Evidently, they think LaPierre is wrong - they want to believe background checks will stop these killings.

Then, our Texas Senator, Cornyn, brings up the facts he has in his hand that most states are not giving the feds the mental reports the states have and TEXAS GIVES MORE MENTAL INFO. ON PEOPLE WANTING TO BUY A GUN THAN ANY OTHER STATE. I'll bet that ticked off those liberal senators on that panel.

Some days as I watch and read the news, by evening, I have to drink medicine in the form of an adult beverage.

My advice after all this news watching and reading - buy more guns and ammo. And, if you know a liberal senator, show him/her a semiautomatic rifle and point to the magazine and define it for him/her - it's not something you read and it is not a clip. Really, if they don't know what a magazine is for a rifle/handgun, they have no business making laws about rifles/handgun/ammo. Have they ever touched a "gun" of any kind? I think they are so afraid of a rifle/handgun, they can't make a rational decision about them. They also want to stop people from buying ammo., but that's another subject.

There are right now, 18 House bills about rifles/handguns/ammo and 7 Senate bills. Have you read them?

[rockinqsranch]

This guy has something against commonsense.

His hat’s too tight I guess.

[M Kehoe]

I read the title, and was going to call the NRA in the morning for an AR-15, mags and ammo...

...I lost mine in the Gulf this year...

5.56mm

[MasterGunner01]

And “arming every last one of us” is bad because? What part of “an armed society is a polite society” don’t you understand comrade Earl Morgan?

[ballplayer]

Good You Pansy