Oh, my. Several people who have heard the full 47% quote tell me they are not likely to vote for Romney. Especially some friends living on modest, mostly SS benefits in their old age.
Let me see if I have this straight: ROMNEY is a phony?
I’m afraid that this joker is caught on the wrong side of the looking-glass.
As Reince Priebus wrote:
As Romney told a C-SPAN interviewer in 2006:"I did get a check from my dad when he passed away. I shouldn’t say a check, but I did inherit some funds from my dad. But I turned and gave that away to charity. In this case I gave it to a school which Brigham Young University established in his honor. ... And that’s where his inheritance ended up."
Why did he give the money away?
"I figured we had enough of our own," he said.
The Tahoe Daily Tribune ^ | November 3, 2012 | Michael Zucker, stockbroker & guest columnist................
ROTFL. Like it matters. Take a hike, Zucker, you sucker.
This guy is a stockbroker? In Tahoe no less? I would never trust this guy with my money. Holy cow.
Liars, reprobates, and sociopaths are generally the folks who accuse others of the very tactics they themselves plan to use. They are so adept at it, they cannot comprehend or recognize the literal truth even when it is standing right in front of them! Or that someone else would conduct themselves in a humble and god-fearing manner. This is the face and work of true evil! But this battle belongs to the LORD!!!!
Try Midol, Michael Zucker.
Icepack, Preperation H?
If Mitt wins, the liberals will lose their ever hating minds.
Anyone STARTING OUT with a quote from the Eugenist GEORGE BERNARD SHAW who personally believed in the EXTERMINATION OF THE “SOCIALLY INCOMPATIBLE is already “suspect” from the start.
“The notion that persons should be safe from extermination as long as they do not commit willful murder, or levy war against the Crown, or kidnap, or throw vitriol, is not only to limit social responsibility unnecessarily, and to privilege the large range of intolerable misconduct that lies outside them, but to divert attention from the essential justification for extermination, which is always incorrigible social incompatibility and nothing else.”
Source: George Bernard Shaw, “On the Rocks” (1933), Preface.
USE OF GAS CHAMBERS
“We should find ourselves committed to killing a great many people whom we now leave living, and to leave living a great many people whom we at present kill. We should have to get rid of all ideas about capital punishment …
A part of eugenic politics would finally land us in an extensive use of the lethal chamber. A great many people would have to be put out of existence simply because it wastes other people’s time to look after them.”
Source: George Bernard Shaw, Lecture to the Eugenics Education Society, Reported in The Daily Express,March 4, 1910.
KILLING THOSE “UNFIT TO LIVE”
“The moment we face it frankly we are driven to the conclusion that the community has a right to put a price on the right to live in it … If people are fit to live, let them live under decent human conditions. If they are not fit to live, kill them in a decent human way. Is it any wonder that some of us are driven to prescribe the lethal chamber as the solution for the hard cases which are at present made the excuse for dragging all the other cases down to their level, and the only solution that will create a sense of full social responsibility in modern populations?”
Source: George Bernard Shaw, Prefaces (London: Constable and Co., 1934), p. 296.
Rolex liberals are evil SOBs...
Such sore losers already.....oh wait - they lost when they first elected the “One.”
Quoting “ George B Shaw on Freerepublic “ has got to be an Oxymoron to say the least.
This hideous man Shaw was a devout fabian socialist who advovated death chambers for “useless people “. Those against socialist dogma that is.
Their logo was and still is “A wolf in sheep’s clothing.”
Give me Mitt Romney any day.
Zucker in certain circles would hardly be considered a “mensch”. I find it interesting that he references Romney’s decision when as governor to deny free meals at state expence to a given group and that leaders of that faith shared Romney’s decision. Zucker then cites a eugneics advocate, Shaw,who’s been quoted by Adolph, and shared Shaw’s viewpoint as well as acted on it. Then Zucker cites an actor who performed in a TV series about the presidency. What happens when Iran drops the bomb on Israel, Mr Sheen ?
Zucker must stand to lose a ton of dough probably invested in wind mills and that kind of stuff.
Dear Michael,
You are wrong about an important thing.
Every man has core principles.
By his acts shall he be known.
Just another jealous jerk - who tried to cheat and failed.
More projection and dishonesty.
If he’s a stockbroker, I don’t want him touching any of my investments. He can ask Bronco Bama if Bronco can invest some of Zucker’s money. Namely ask Bronco to raise his taxes. I’m sure Mr. Zucker would agree to forfeit another fifty percent of his income for the good of the country. (smirk)
Yet these whiners were happy to vote for such as John Kerry and the Kennedy family like those folks understood how common folk live. None of them ever had a real job versus a figure head, token position.
Obama inherited wealth. And has produced ruin.