Posted on 08/01/2012 11:18:33 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
"Meet The Parents....of alias Barack Obama. Black Sunni Muslim father and White Lebanese Christian mother. Born in the ME, raised in Indonesia, became BHO II in 1982." Dr. Ron J. Polland
The Mal-Val youtube video at the link was posted by FReeper Polarik (Dr. Ron Polland) in August of 2011 and while morphing the image of a woman named Val into an image of Obama, he insinuates that Val is Obamas mom. One year later this youtube has only 1,150 views.
In July 2012, two FReepers associated the woman, Val, in Polariks Youtube with Lebanese actress Valerie Sarruf and have posted multiple images of her at various ages on FR eligibility threads. I am opening this thread to invite discussion of and links to any evidence that either supports or refutes a claim that Valerie Sarruf is Barack Obamas mother, with or without Malcolm X being his father.
Where could Malcolm X and Valerie Sarruf have been in 1960 when baby Barry would have been conceived? Is there any evidence that Sarruf could have been pregnant and delivered a baby in 1961? In what country could the baby have been delivered? How and when could the alleged Mal-Val baby have been inserted into the identity and life narrative of the person we have come to know as Barack Hussein Obama?
Full disclosure: I refute categorically all of the Mal-Val narrative as wildly speculative and unsupported by any evidence that I have seen so far.
For several years now a shadowy coterie of FReepers styling themselves as researchers has gone onto nearly every FR eligibility thread to aggressively refute all evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham was Barack Obamas mother. They have actually declared flat out that she was never in Hawaii before 1963, contrary to the voluminous evidence including INS FOIA documents!
Requests for links or any evidence that Stanley Ann is NOT the mom have been frequently met with abusive ad hominem attacks and accompanied by claims that ALL documentary evidence showing her to have been in Hawaii in 1960 and 1961 is forged, but no credible evidence of forgery has offered. I make this observation as a retired Certified Fraud Examiner and CPA.
For years the researchers had claimed mysteriously to have conclusive evidence that a different woman is Barrys mom, but refused to reveal her name or any evidence other than her picture because the researchers claimed it would disappear from the net and/or from hard copy archives of the records. But this month, the researchers appear to have slipped up and revealed that Valerie Sarruf has been the woman whose identity they have been protecting. They have since attempted to walk back the revelation, but it is clear, IMO.
The researchers claim that they earnestly want to remove Obama from office. But wouldnt revealing ALL EVIDENCE of a foreign mother and foreign birth (which they also claim) be the most logical approach to removing Obama rather than hiding the identity of this alternative mother for years while attacking FR threads that sincerely attempt to find out where Stanley Ann Dunham was when she gave birth to Barry?
In my opinion, the best evidence that Valerie Sarruf is NOT Barrys mother is the mountain of evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham IS his mother, which the researchers have totally failed to refute.
Again, please use this thread for discussion of and links to any evidence that either supports or refutes a claim that Valerie Sarruf IS Barack Obamas mother with or without Malcolm X being his father.
Cross-posting:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2989394/replies?c=160
To: MarthaT
“Truth is: the Mother of Barack Obama is far from dead, far from obese, and far from folksy. Shes been far from Indonesia, too. All these years, The Mother of Americas President has been here, in America,...”
So that means all those pedalling Valerie Sarruf and Stanley Ann Dunham are blowing smoke?
160 posted on 03/03/2013 7:38:35 AM PST by ABrit (awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
To: ABrit
Toxic, evil, deceitful smoke. Thanks be to God for the mistakes theyve made, [and keep making]. And that the fraud/forgery efforts they have long congratulated themselves as professional are, in fact, crude and amateurish.
It is important to keep in mind that, core to their scheme, this group proliferates identities. Some are stolen; some are composite; some are wholly fabricated. One identity can also sport many others. One actual person can, in fact, occupy several different lives.
From my studies it appears that this propensity for identity fabrication originates in deep, primitive self-loathing, soothed by the fantasy that, as Uncle Fred Newman insisted, all you have to do is imagine who you want to be, Perform Your Life as that person, and you become that person. This model is clearly exemplified with the Barack Obama synthetic identity as he Performs His Presidency.
As for Stanley Ann, this identity may prove to be partially accurate - in that she and Jo Ann at some point had a fraudulent identity connection - but for the sake of our investigation, what is relevant is that a.k.a. BHOII was born to a person known at the time as [Jo] Ann/Anna Newman.
162 posted on 03/03/2013 9:50:01 AM PST by MarthaT (Terrible Truth - Investigative Research On The Actual Personal History Of “Barack Hussein Obama II”)
They had six daughters: Attallah (b. 1958, named for Attila the Hun);[62][63] Qubilah (b. 1960, named for Kublai Khan);[64] Ilyasah (b. 1962, named for Elijah Muhammad);[65] Gamilah Lumumba (b. 1964, named for Patrice Lumumba);[66] and twins Malikah and Malaak (b. 1965 after their father's death, and named for him).[67]
As the image of the apparently white woman holding a something like six month old infant in that photograph from the NOI publication shows, which publication was dated April 1962 depicting a meeting in February...it's doubtful that the woman and the child shown are Mrs MX and one of her several daughters.
It's possible what we see here is the au pair and the little boy she showed to Susan. Stanley Ann Dunham once made a rather enigmatic comment to a friend...she said; I don't need to get married to have a baby... doesn't anyone remember that?
I see there’s another disrupting idiot waiting in the wings. Good that you caught that, another steaming pile of poop to jump over.
Moving right along:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2913366/posts?page=1482#1482
Maybe she meant Nancy Pelosi?
Now we’ve got this one, can Martha be far behind? 5.4.3.2.1...
On a more realistic note, this is round about the same period in history that the Brooklyn Bridge first came onto the market...
To continue:
About halfway through the movie I decided I’d seen enough, and turned to my mother to see if she might be ready to go. But her face, lit by the blue glow of the screen, was set in a wistful gaze. At that moment I felt as if I were being given a window into her heart, the unreflective heart of her youth. I suddenly realised that the depiction of the childlike blacks I was now seeing on the screen, the reverse image of Conrad’s dark savages, was what my mother had carried with her to Hawaii all those years before, a reflection of the simple fantasies that had been forbidden to a white, middle-class girl from Kansas, the promise of another life: warm, sensual, exotic, different.”
And this movie, and his mother’s undiminished rapture at it, was to be the subject of fierce self-questioning about his relationship with her: “The emotions between the races could never be pure; even love was tarnished by the desire to find in the other some element that was missing in ourselves.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2009/feb/02/barack-obama-black-orpheus
Ayres at his best? Bridge for sale, slightly rusted; cheap.
I remember that unusual statement. Especially unusual in that era. It kind of jumped out at me...
Funny the Martha doppleganger showed up.
That revolting excerpt by Ayers verges into sick porn.
They thought they were being very clever, mixing up fiction and a small bit of factoid here and there. The small bits of factoids shed more light on the lies, rather than making the lies look like truth. they thought people would swallow the whole pottage but they were wrong! More people are going to be questioning this poison myth and will be asking "Who IS he?"
Every profound lie needs a little truth to hang its hat on. If there had never been a black kenyan student in Hawaii they would have found someone else. He was there at the right time.
If there had never been a girl named Stanley Ann Dunham, some other white girl would have been chosen and paid to take that child to someone like Susan Blake, then fly out to Boston that same day, as Susan said.
The purpose was to give the child an ID.
Our purpose is to try and find who his parents were and where he came from. So far, all we do know is that he probably had one white parent and one who was somewhat coloured.
(Add to that and stir was you see fit.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4A3bYdwSsr8&list=UUp5Mqb8hSKGI1hbk5ayzXXA&index=18&feature=plcp
Take note of the caption:
Sepember 1964. Leaving a second summit in August, Malcolm traveled to Kenya, where he ran into SNCC activists John Lewis and Donald Harris and spent ??? days discussing the civil rights movement, he flew from Kenya to Tanzania with President Jomo Kenyatta of Kenya and Ugandan President Milton Obote. He made a return visit to Nigeria and made his last stop in Comakry, French West Africa (now Guinea)
Our purpose is to try and find who his parents were and where he came from. So far, all we do know is that he probably had one white parent and one who was somewhat coloured.
The only way to find the truth - which is what you researchers have done very well - is to not accept anything from Ayers' book, from news articles, press releases or any other material without other corroborating evidence. Starting with a clean sheet of paper, so to speak. So many others start with something on that paper as a given, and that is the fatal mistake, because any new info they find has to be jammed and forced into what they think they "know", or just tossed aside if it doens't "fit".
And of course some of these book writers or others have more nefarious agendas than just clinging to preconceptions. By starting from scratch, then researchers find what parts of the myth are true, and which ones aren't, rather than just accepting parts and having to bend and twist new findings into the existing framework.
You've all done very well, in fact, excellent work. Everyone interested in truth - owes you all big time.
Maraniss writes a book, he gets his stuff from the two characters who run the Seattle Museum of the Mysteries, (big foot, ghosts of the famous departed, UFO’s and homosexual parades and fairy festivals) Sally Jacobs writes a book, she has the unredacted immigration file for the kenyan for two years before the book is published (she knows the maiden name of ANNA and/or Ann S Obama, but she’s not telling) Marable writes a book, he’s been collecting MX history, publications, speeches, film, biographies for ten years (iirc, all housed at Columbia University) he tells of Betty and Malcolm both having affairs, the daughters are furious...and so it goes. One layer of BS upon another, and when someone, anyone, like Marable who just might have known what was what (but he’s dead) tries to suggest that maybe the sky is blue after all, it’s not green as some want us to believe...out come the big guns:
YOU’RE A RACIST!
STANLEY ANN DUNHAM WAS HIS MOTHER!
THE KGB PAID FOR HER TO HAVE THE BABY IN KENYA!
My reply; No I’m not. No she wasn’t. And No again, truth is stranger than any fiction the obstructionists can concoct.
Thanks for the ping!
Philip Lipson and Charlette Le Fevre who discovered the name of the woman ANNA OBAMA listed in the Seattle Polk directory for 1961, and who provided the photograph of the house which was supposedly at that address, where Mary, the famous baby sitter, babysat a child for that same woman she identified as ANNA for whom she said she baby sat when her own daughter, born in July 1959, was 18 months of age, and I'm not doing the math again, Mary is having enough trouble explaining how she made that come out as 1962, when it should have been 1961.
And btw, someone should tell that author David Maraniss that if he plans to attend the next fairy festival in Seattle organized by Charlette, he better book in early. Same goes for the next UFO Seminar. Places are limited. PLenty of space at the next Gay Pride Parade, however.
A visit to the Seattle Museum of the Mysteries is a must.
See you there.
seattle chat club news article link
Brooklyn Bridge going cheap, get in early, send me your deposit now. Never to be repeated offer, don't miss out.
Washington State’s only Legends and Lore Online Museum
Come explore the Legends and Lore of the Northwest
The Legend of DB Cooper
UFO History, Bigfoot and Ghost Museum
See also
Maury Island UFO Mystery
Legend of D.B. Cooper and latest information
The Lost City of Wellington - 1910 Railroad tragedy, maps and photos and newspaper documents
Rare and never seen before photos of Bruce Lee and Frances Farmer
See a historic photo of Barack Obama’s first house in Seattle
http://www.seattlechatclub.org/
MARY REFERRED TO HER AS ANNA, THAT’S HOW WE KNEW SHE MEANT STANLEY ANN DUNHAM??
No, Charlette, Mary referred to her as ANNA because that’s who she was. Just like in the Polk. That was ANNA OBAMA. And it was in JANUARY 1961. Which indicates that Stanley Ann Dunham was still in high school somewhere when Anna’s child was conceived.
Isn’t that right, Charlette?
Charlette LeFevre with Dennis Kucinich
MX sure travelled a lot, on whose dime, I wonder.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.