Every profound lie needs a little truth to hang its hat on. If there had never been a black kenyan student in Hawaii they would have found someone else. He was there at the right time.
If there had never been a girl named Stanley Ann Dunham, some other white girl would have been chosen and paid to take that child to someone like Susan Blake, then fly out to Boston that same day, as Susan said.
The purpose was to give the child an ID.
Our purpose is to try and find who his parents were and where he came from. So far, all we do know is that he probably had one white parent and one who was somewhat coloured.
(Add to that and stir was you see fit.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4A3bYdwSsr8&list=UUp5Mqb8hSKGI1hbk5ayzXXA&index=18&feature=plcp
Our purpose is to try and find who his parents were and where he came from. So far, all we do know is that he probably had one white parent and one who was somewhat coloured.
The only way to find the truth - which is what you researchers have done very well - is to not accept anything from Ayers' book, from news articles, press releases or any other material without other corroborating evidence. Starting with a clean sheet of paper, so to speak. So many others start with something on that paper as a given, and that is the fatal mistake, because any new info they find has to be jammed and forced into what they think they "know", or just tossed aside if it doens't "fit".
And of course some of these book writers or others have more nefarious agendas than just clinging to preconceptions. By starting from scratch, then researchers find what parts of the myth are true, and which ones aren't, rather than just accepting parts and having to bend and twist new findings into the existing framework.
You've all done very well, in fact, excellent work. Everyone interested in truth - owes you all big time.