The basic rule is NO antagonism is allowed, from either side.
Here’s the thread where the ‘scientism’ tag is being hashed out.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2038869/posts?q=1&;page=511
To: Kevmo
Scientism would have to be YOUR religion to tag it as a “Scientism Caucus” and the article and replies could not speak for any non-Scientism believers.
However, you could tag the RF Scientism thread as “[ecumenical]” and anyone could post but they must not be antagonistic.
505 posted on Monday, July 30, 2012 8:35:34 PM by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
I found this confusing, and figured I would see a series of responses in the vein of bunnies, pancakes and stuned beebers.
When I see “ecumenical”, “hydrotron”, “Athanor” and “scientism” I wonder if discussion of Thetans and planet Kolob can be far behind.
So is this new thread by Kevmo what you had in mind to allow?
In my original post I said that the device should be taken apart and analyzed after it has worked for a while to see if there have been changes in which elements are there or isotopes of elements. If those have changed that is evidence of a nuclear reaction of some type. On the other hand if only chemical compounds made from the same elements have changed, then it is purely a chemical reaction and it might just be the world's most expensive "potato" battery.
I thought high schools had teachers, not professors. Is this another case of cold fusion credential inflation?
He's referred to as a high school teacher here.
Bookmarking for later reading.