Link to article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bennett-l-gershman/trayvon-martin-witnesses_b_1549128.html
You know damn well they were. Coached and paid.
So were they lying the first time or are they lying now?
Throw the whole damn thing out!
High-tech lynching.
Coached, coerced and intimidated.
Trayvon Martin shooting wasn’t a case of racial profiling
http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/30/opinion/nejame-zimmerman-racial-profiling/index.html
Facts seem real muddy and in such situations, I thought that innocent until proven guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt meant something, but not in the court of MSM public opinion. Time will tell.
What would you trust someone who just tells what they saw when they had no idea how it would be interpreted or someone who after seeing a lynch mob changes their story in ways that appease the mob?
IIRC, “Witness #2” is the one who, in another story, was quoted as saying people should “shoot to wound” and Zimmerman could have just shot Martin in the leg. (*facepalm*)
As for dirty play by the prosecutor here...certainly possible. She’s got what most legal experts believe to be an extremely weak case, and she is likely facing a lot of pressure to make something stick. I think, though, there is also probably some “cold feet” going on by some of the witnesses. In a perfect world, a witness doesn’t get intimidated, either by the media or a prosecutor. In realville, people worry about what might happen to them if they get dragged into the same media spotlight as Zimmerman.
I try (not always successfully since buying a new car) to tithe a portion of my pay to charity. I usually give to Boystown, Salvation Army, and the Shriners. This pay I am making a donation to Zimmerman’s defense fund.
IMO since Angela Corey wants to follow in Mike Nifong’s footsteps perhaps someone should do something to see that she meets the same fate (disbarment etc.)
IMO since Angela Corey wants to follow in Mike Nifong’s footsteps perhaps someone should do something to see that she meets the same fate (disbarment etc.)