That is a distortion of history and I won't let you get away with it. For example, during the invasion of PA Lee order his troops to PAY for everything they appropriated - no looting. There was no mis-conduct and it was not tolerated. The reason I know this is because I have researched history, both sides are not equally guilty. the difference is the South ordered ransacking to NOT to happen and when it did, which it did on a few occasions, it was punished. Any pillage incidents by the South was an anomaly and was not ordered or tolerated. The NORTH ordered pillaging and looting TO happen.
To tell the truth I wish the Southern Armies HAD acted like Sherman's bummers. The South played the gentleman to the North's rapist.
"To tell the truth I wish the Southern Armies HAD acted like Sherman's bummers. The South played the gentleman to the North's rapist."
I'm certain you well know that:
For example: Chambersburg, Pennsylvania was visited three times by Confederate armies:
From June 2428, 1863, much of the Army of Northern Virginia passed through Chambersburg[40][41] en route to Carlisle and Gettysburg, and Robert E. Lee established his headquarters at a nearby farm."
'Remember Chambersburg' soon became a Union battle cry.[45]"
Note the 1862 kidnapping of "eight young colored men and boys". And what was their fate?
But also note that except for the unknown fate of those "young colored men and boys", we are only talking about burning and pillaging, not rape and murder.
The same is true of Northern armies in the Confederacy.