Posted on 08/31/2011 10:21:44 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Texas Governor Rick Perry has a problem.
You see, since becoming the newly-minted national frontrunner for the Republican nomination for president in 2012, he now finds himself standing in a red jumpsuit before four bad-tempered bulls: his rivals in the Republican field, the Republican establishment, the national mainstream media, and the Obama White House. Compounding his woes is the fact that he faces these foes with a hefty albatross around his neck: He is a white man.
In 2008, one of then-candidate Obamas greatest electoral assets was the history-making nature of his campaign to become the first rich, Ivy League-educated, Protestant, male president who also happened to black. This cycle too promises to be historic, as we have Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann vying to become the first truly fringe president, Georgia pizza tycoon Herman Cain vying to become the first president to have his own gospel album (its true!), and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich vying to run the worst winning campaign since William McKinley campaigned from his front porch.
But the history-making only reaches veritably transcendental proportions when the candidate is a member of an oppressed minority. Election 2008 also-rans Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and ex-Alaska Governor Sarah Palin can both attest to the fact that running against a member of a historically disenfranchised group is an exceedingly difficult task.
So what is Governor Perry to do? He could attempt to emulate the politics of working-class white victimization that the Grand Old Party has perfected to an art form since the Nixon Administration. But as rural America continues to shrivel into an increasingly cantankerous, backwater husk with declining electoral relevance, this class of identity politics may prove inadequate in 2012. Luckily for the governor, he does have one other potential victim card in his hand.
As a native Texan, I can speak to the intolerance on which my state prides itself; hence the political potency of the perennial rumors of our governors closeted homosexuality. Festering since at least 2004, when Perry was forced to confront it head-on in The Austin-American Statesman, the ambiguity surrounding the governors sexual orientation has routinely provided fodder for colorful political sallying. Even our state Democrats cant resist some good old gay-baiting.
In the 2010 cycle, for example, Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison was shamefully caught juicing her gubernatorial campaign website with the search engine optimization keywords rick perry gay. Democratic political action committee Back to Basics, likewise, ran a delightful statewide newspaper ad campaign asserting that When he's not in San Francisco Perry's flipping through the pages of his Food and Wine magazine in his fancy rental mansion, a message Noreen Malone described on New York Magazines Daily Intel blog as clearly meant to remind voters that Perry's red-blooded American maleness wasn't an established fact.
Some have predicted that the obstinacy of these rumors will impede Perrys presidential ambitions in the same way that persistent allegations of President Obamas Muslim faith and lack of birthright citizenship impeded his. I would suggest, however, that, sadly enough, these rumors might actually be a political godsend for the governor, and the very best political move he could make right nowin what may be a fairly damning indictment of our systemwould actually be to embrace them wholeheartedly and come out of the closet as the second openly gay governor in American history (the first, of course, was the disgraced Jim McGreevey of New Jersey).
The political meed of coming out is considerable. The political calculus of a Perry candidacy was that he was perhaps the only politician in America capable of satisfying both the Tea Party and establishment wings of the Republican Party. However, since his announcement, even the Republican establishment has signed on to the fact that Perry is George W. Bush without the intelligence and moderation, and that the American people may not be so keen on hiring the former presidents stunt double so soon after so-emphatically rejecting his legacy by electing Barack Obama in the first place. Polls have confirmed this, for while he does not quite achieve Palin-Bachmann-Gingrich levels of radioactivity on the electoral dosimeter, Perry consistently underperforms frontrunner Mitt Romney in head-to-head polls with President Obama and has yet to beat the incumbent in a single poll. To say the least, Governor Perry has an electability problem.
And that is the beauty of the coming-out strategy.
President Obama faces potentially crippling levels of discontent from his truculent base, and the prospect of an openly gay Republican opponent could drive a decisive wedge between the president and the left. Gay donors and voters rightly disgusted by the presidents prevaricating on the issue of gay marriage may choose to overlook Perrys virulently anti-gay record and platform to embrace one of their own. The disillusioned latte-sipping yuppies of Cambridge and Manhattan may also decide that the optics of opting for the gay candidate is more conducive to maintaining their self-righteous guise of social progressiveness than the symbolism of retaining the comparatively gay-friendly incumbent.
Of course, there is an obvious ethical issue in a straight man coming out merely for a political advantage, but this is politics were discussing, and Rick Perry in particular. Given that he is party to the execution of an innocent man (remember the name Cameron Todd Willinghamyou will be hearing it a lot soon), Im not quite convinced that morality really factors into Governor Perrys decision-making in any way whatsoever. Furthermore, its not as if admitting he is gay would not redound to the nations benefit: Were Perry to come out of the closet this Wednesday during the Republican presidential debate, Michele Bachmanns head could quite possibly explode on live television.
So if Perry is gay, wont the left just love him?
That’s like asking if they’ll like Sarah Palin because she’s an accomplished woman or Herman Cain because he’s a successful black man!
ROTFLMAO!!!
OMG!!!
So damn funny how lame these guys are.
a total hit piece if you ever read one.
/snicker
Liberal pipe dreams.
As I understand it, there’s a guy out there named Larry Sinclair who says he had sex with Rick Perry. All anyone has to do is interview that guy and......oh......wait a minute....maybe I’m thinking of a different Presidential candidate.
“So if Perry is gay, wont the left just love him?”
I think that’s what this deranged leftist is trying to say, in his humorless ‘funny’ way.
These attacks on Perry are desperation.
The bathhouses of Chicago & the suburbs (and probably Indonesia, Kenya, Pakistan and Hawaii) are filled with guys who could testify to that....
Say, Harvard Crimson, you seen any of Bamboozle’s college thesises or scholastic records laying around anywhere?
At least they correctly list the main stream media as one of Perry’s rivals.
The hell you say.
LG - FYI.
It’s only a matter of time before he’s outed for being AMBIDEXTROUS.
I took this as satire, bacon fat against the media and the White House operatives who will be starting early with the oppostion dumping of the kitchen sink and fairy tales against Rick Perry. Last week they called out the Texas crew to begin. They have got to get his poll numbers down, and fast. The article seems to be spoofing how they will be attempting to do that. I don’t know, the people are so anxious for another leader to emerge and get on with some early and well orgainized push back against the Marxist machine in the WH, that Rick’s early routing success may be enough to roll every one in the race, so we can begin to do that pushing back. Success often breeds more of the same. Certainly, this is not his first rodeo and though he is fearless, they may not know that yet.
Harvard Crimson or Harvard Lampoon?
Take the hook out of your mouths.
This is bullshit.
You’re basically becoming the Palin version of pissant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.