Posted on 07/05/2011 3:20:04 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Exactly. As a conservative, I can be against homosexuality, but that doesn’t mean I hate the individual.
Many people (including homosexuals, liberals and even conservatives) cannot get their head around that. To them, condemnation of their actions gets personalized.
This is not to say I can be against the individual as well. I can be, and often am due to the nature of that person’s actions, especially when it comes to the advocacy of their beliefs.
I believe that liberalism is wrong and innately evil, and that those who devote their lives to pushing it on others are deserving of our malediction. This is self preservation, not the impulse to blindly hate.
satan pens another attack... DEY GOT NUTT’N
LLS
” To them, condemnation of their actions gets personalized.”
They’ve turned a behavior and made it an “identity”.
The sex act they engage in becomes who they are, and then a culture has been developed around it.
If you don’t like the behavior - if you argue against it - then it is personal to them. They think you are attacking everything they hold dear.
Trig did not choose to be born with Downs Syndrome.
If he chose to become a homosexual you might love your child but hate his choice.......
This is exactly right and is the reason why their choice is prerequisite of their introduction to new people. Have you ever introduced yourself to someone and stated you were heterosexual? I can't say that my heterosexuality has forced me to speak abnormally or gesture abnormally, either. It's a psychotic farce.
bfl
The article’s writer is equating homosexuality with a birth defect, which should go over real well with her intended audience.
Dope.
And the funny thing is - while they are very sensitive about any questioning of their behavior - don’t think for a second that they are all love and acceptance about “straights”.
There is alot of accusations of “hatred” and “bigotry” being bandied about - yet they seem to hold great resentment and hatred towards all things traditional.
testing,testing...1,2,3...is this thing on?
so being gay is having a medical condition ?
The one thing any objective person would recognize is that Sarah is not a hypocrite.
Governor Palin was pro-life when she had four wonderful, healthy, perfect, and adorable children. She was pro-life when she was told that her fifth child would have Down's. She was pro-life when her teenage daughter became pregnant. She is pro-life, and her values do not change simply for personal convenience.
Governor Palin was pro-military when she posed for photo ops with the Alaska National Guard. Sarah was pro-military when she insisted that she be notified of military funerals in the state so she could attend. Sarah was pro-military when she sent her oldest son off to Iraq in the United States Army. Sarah is patriotic, and her love for America is not a part-time act.
The far left fringe doesn't object to Sarah because they think she's a hypocrite; just the opposite. Their real objection is that she means everything she says, and sincerity scares them. That's why they like Mitt so much and want us to choose him over Sarah - he never leaves them feeling like he means what he says.
There is a magic queer gene, that makes them special and not sinful.
Shoving a broomstick, cuke, or carrot up my same sex lover's orifice is natural and not abnormal and I want to belong to your church to prove that I'm not different.
You’re right. Much like the civil rights struggle for “equality” has now turned into outright discrimination of whites by blacks, I fully expect gays to one day demand that marriage be the legal definition that only applies to them.
Their rejection of God does not allow them to practice their lifestyle without guilt. The self-knowledge of their own guilt is manifested by their rage against non-homosexuals, against the society that surrounds them and its norms, and by their constant efforts to corrupt and destroy that society and those not burdened by the flaw they themselves carry. No matter what they do, what they demand, they will find themselves no better off, no happier in any replacement society.
That's a rhetorical question, right?
they might be nice enough to let us get married - but pretty soon they are going to bring the battle into the schools.
If I teach my child one thing at home about marriage - and the new definition is being taught at school - guess who is going to get a visit from the social workers?
Guess who’s child is going to be told “well...mommy is a closed minded bigot and doesn’t know what she’s talking about”
The churches will get sued for refusing to perform ceremonies.
Religious adoption agencies will be sued for placing children in traditional families.
this article is a new spin on an old joke.
I remember hearing a gay comic on TV years ago say something like...”ya wanna convince a bunch of jesus freaks to become pro-choice? Discover the gay gene and tell them their baby is gay!”
They think that christians would rather have them dead - and when whackos like the Fred Phelps gang do their thing, it helps support this misconception.
And so...I’m sure the author of this article is doing a wink and a nod to the gay community - they think that Sarah would absolutely have aborted that boy if she were told he was gay rather than Down’s! That’s how hateful and bigoted christians are afterall!
So the author is mocking Sarah - pretending she never would have written a love filled letter towards a gay son.
The fact is that there is no doctor or scientist who can predict the future sexual thoughts or behavior of any new born child. There is no scientific or medical test for homosexuality because it is a behavior and not an innate trait such as race or a known born medical condition.
If liberals such as this writer are not hypocrites themselves, then by the standards they accuse others of, I guess they will love and support all people based upon their behaviors; pedophiles, rapists, murderers, thieves, etc….. ???
And before anyone answers I already know that to some extent they already do, they support murder (abortion) and they have been known to support murderers like Stanley ‘Tookie’ Williams, they also support thieves in the name of wealth redistribution, the list goes on.
The same could be said of homosexuality, given the false premise that it is an inborn disease.
Just because science has not discovered a genetic basis for homosexuality does not mean the premise is flawed. You would presume that genetic science on this and other cause-and-effects is settled and complete? It is not.
I believe in our lifetime, science will find a biological basis for homsexuality. (Although there may also be cases caused by behavioral conditioning and sexual abuse, even personal choice, etc)
Those of us who have had homosexuality “run in the family”, or know other families where it runs from generation to generation, sometimes for many generations dating back a century or more (known), know that something is inherited or passed along .... whether is a gene or a brain chemistry or brain structural abnormality, a predisposition. Ditto with inherited depression, bipolarity, schizophrenia, other conditions that originate from the brain.
And that it manifests at a very early age.
I also believe homosexual activists may not want science to discover this because it could lead to pre-birth extermination, as is happening with Downs babies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.