>>The non sequitur is in your court since you are the one ignoring facts and all.<<
Since you misinterpret the term I can’t really address your post.
I’m perfectly familiar with the term “it does not follow” aka non sequitur, capiche?
Your claim that the BC is most likely a forgery, but is not ‘a viable political option’, is absurd. That claim is not only absurd, its contradictory and definitely ‘does not follow’ making it the real non sequitur here.
Comprende? Res Ipsa Loquitur.