Really?
Posted on 06/07/2011 6:45:09 PM PDT by conservativegramma
Typeface analysis shows images come from different machines
The online image of a Hawaiian "Certificate of Live Birth" was trumpeted by the White House when it was released on April 27 as "proof positive" that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.
Now an expert in typefaces and typography says it sure was "proof," but not of what the White House would have wanted.
Paul Irey, a retired professional typographer with 50 years experience in his business, has says an analysis of the typefaces used in the Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate that the White House released on April 27 reveals it absolutely to be a forgery.
"My analysis proves beyond a doubt that it would be impossible for the different letters that appear in the Obama birth certificate to have been typed by one typewriter," Irey told WND.
"Typewriters in 1961 could not change the size and shape of a letter on the fly like that," he said. "This document is definitely a forgery."
Irey acknowledges that an IBM Selectric typewriter could have produced different typefaces in a given document, but only if the Selectric ball was changed every time a different typeface letter was struck which would be unlikely to have been done to produce the word "Student," for example, that had two different styles of the lower case "t."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
LOL When one disappears another one pops up on the other end of the counter.
What/where is your basis of information that any child born in the USA is a “natural born citizen irrespective of parents and I presume you mean any foreign or non-citizen parents?
Now, how do you suppose the typed letters got put on the forms?
Bwaaaahahahahahahahahaaaaaaa!
Now we're back to pulling the document out of one typewriter and putting it in another to get two different font capital 'A's in the name BARACK on line 8. Toooooo funny!
Hardly. If these are manual typewriters it’s case closed.
No, we never drank on the job.
I didn’t notice the first two commas in the samples you posted but did the obvious space in the third one. I’m used to seeing inconsistencies in typing but can’t think of a reason for the space offhand, may not mean anything. The first two might be more telling, also the spacing is tight on the second, taller-thinner comma, and it curves to the left more sharply than the one after the 4. No, I’m out of explanations (and patience) for now.
Like opening the screen door to throw a moth outside. ;^)
That “a” has picked up a lot of ink. Is it so very surprising that the ink spread over the imaginary line? Look at how the “a” and “n” in the same word are joined. It’s the same thing: too much ink on an absorbent surface like paper. Nothing fancy or modern or highly technical required.
How do you figure that? If there are two different fonts in one word on the same letter how does a manual typewriter account for that?
Did you notice all those filled in letters you cruised on by? DIRT! Builds up on both sides of the type face unless you clean it regularly.
And causes different fonts. Bwaaaaahahahahaaaaaaaa!
Notice how damned near every letter on the document is misformed, misshaped and any many cases run together. No typewriter does that. Hell, no word processor does that. Must be a hand forgery!
BD, yes the e looks misshapen compared to the others; as somebody noted they look like the Greek letter theta. Since we don't know exactly how it was produced and how many processes it was put thru, it's possible letters could get morphed. The point about aging has some merit, but the .pdf version looks freshly minted.
We would expect that a good forgery would look pretty much like other documents of similar nature and vintage.
The Nordyke Twins documents are of similar nature and vintage. There are a lot of common features there.
BTW, regarding nurses doing typing, nurses type now or they are not given good assignments. Everything is computerized. You go to Kaiser Permanente EVEN THEIR DOCTORS type!
Back to the filled in characters. Is that “dirt” or is that irregular pixelation? What do you think it is?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.