You're probably one of those who think ... Your solution probably involves
You're probably one of those people who when unable to find something specific to disagree with, invents a position for someone else, and then argues against it. If you don't like what I said, stick to refuting what I said, not your half witted assumptions of my position. But just to clarify, I think CHILDREN (and only Children - not adults) should be protected from themselves somewhat, because children do not have the experience or knowldege to accurately assess the risks of their behavior.
About the animals. I could give a crap. I'll eat them at MacDonalds when the rodeo is finished with them, so the retard who called me a Peta person can shove it.
Attitudes...
Au Contraire. It's attitudes like yours where you rush to condemn without having a single solitary clue as to what the other person is talking about are what leads to problems. Now what do I consider children. Hmm we send 18 year olds into combat, so 18 is a good cutoff under that wear protective gear like kids being required to wear bicycle helmets over that do whatever you want. Now does that give you something to argue against without having to fabricate a false position for me and then attack it?
But having said that, if I decided that in order to feel 'alive' I needed to climb into the Octagon with Chuck Liddel I would expect people to question my sense of judgment, let alone my intelligence.
Bulls usually end up in dog food...
That being said, I have always questioned the grade of beef fast food places use...