No, the State of Hawaii confirmed that the (legally invalid, as they indirectly confirmed elsewhere) vital records SAY Obama was born in Hawaii.
But now we’ve got Abercrombie saying the records he can find are a notation in the archives.
So we’ve got discrepancies in the official stories out of Hawaii’s government.
What do you think is the proper procedure for dealing with discrepancies?
Yes, and since vital records about births consist of birth birth certificates, that implies his birth certificate says he was born in Hawaii.
But now we’ve got Abercrombie saying the records he can find are a notation in the archives.
That is not what he said.
So we’ve got discrepancies in the official stories out of Hawaii’s government.
No we don't.