Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

1.) Who are these people who think Mayor Bloomberg is a credible third party candidate? (2.) Why is the homosexual agenda always compared to black civil rights? (3.) Why is anti-Christian bigotry the only one that doesn't elicit scorn, ridicule and shunning?
1 posted on 12/05/2010 5:33:03 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet
When conservative forces in the south were arguing for separate but equal facilities for blacks during the civil rights struggle, does any version of history look back and exonerate the apes that held onto the conservative position? No!

Wait a minute...I thought it was the rats who were against integration. ???

2 posted on 12/05/2010 5:37:14 PM PST by Aria ( "Remember, attitudes are contagious, so make sure yours are worth catching." Sarah Palin 9-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

As a high school kid I asked a woman why she voted for a particular candidate. She replied that she ‘just liked him better than his opponent.’ Logical or not, that’s the sort of thinking that elects candidates and I expect the next President to be elected by similar criteria. I believe Sarah is versed well enough in foreign policy to keep us out of trouble, which is more than can be said of the present occupant of the oval office and by the time 2012 gets here she’ll be a whole lot better liked than he is. If she runs, she’ll win.


3 posted on 12/05/2010 5:38:33 PM PST by oldfart (Obama nation = abomination. Think about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There is only one way to stop it... Have Obama and Biden resign and let Boehner be President.


4 posted on 12/05/2010 5:39:20 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

>>would have told you that Sarah was much more powerful as a king-maker and not a King. <<

Someone gives me a distillation of my arguments to date...


5 posted on 12/05/2010 5:41:03 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Lt. Drebin: Like a blind man at an orgy, I was going to have to feel my way through.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Randian Regressives”?

Oh sure, there’s some conservative jargon for you.


7 posted on 12/05/2010 5:41:57 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy Was Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

fight bigotry and discrimination against white male, christian and productive ppl should be the next civil rights movement. Don’t ppl think its unfair that just because you’re born a white male that you’re punished? Because you work twice as long as the next person that you’re treatment differently and punished?


8 posted on 12/05/2010 5:43:10 PM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"You know why I am snob? Why I am elitist? Because liberals – or progressives are right. You are wrong. End of story."

"whose side will you be on? The Fred Phelps hate mongers and Military macho dick wavers who want to keep gays in the closet?"

"crucifix clutchers"

Why is it that they can crudely ridicule our heart-felt beliefs with such alacrity, in the public eye, without eliciting any kind of censure?

9 posted on 12/05/2010 5:44:14 PM PST by Celtic Cross (I AM the Impeccable Hat. (AKA The Pope's Hat))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Palin and her followers will disagree, of course, on the grounds that since archeologists place the Stone Age about 700,00 years ago and therefore 694 thousand years before their world began,

Huh?
What kind of number is 700,00?

Is this cat trying to say Palin is a "young earth" creationist?

That she thinks the earth is 6,000 years old?

Is that true, is that her belief?

Because, although I refuse to cheer-lead for her, I would
certainly vote for her should she run & be nominated.

Unless she believes that load of bunk. That would make her a nutcase.

10 posted on 12/05/2010 5:44:14 PM PST by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think there is a very real possibility of a Bloomberg or Trump 3rd party run.

I see that as a very good thing for Sarah Palin. The race would look an awful lot like Rubio’s senate race in FL with Bloomberg or Trump splitting the liberal vote with Obama, allowing Palin to win.


11 posted on 12/05/2010 5:46:04 PM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is all pure unreasoned crap. Liberal masturbation. Bloomberg is a loser. He had to screw with the laws to win again.

This writer worked for DENNIS KUSINICH. That is the type of crack smoking lib he is. He states he is always right because he is a commie. How is that? Has he picked up a paper lately? I would like this dolt to point to the one successes this administration had using his progressive ideas.


13 posted on 12/05/2010 5:47:49 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

To your last question - it’s predicted because they hated Him (Christ) even before they hated us. It’s only going to get worse.


17 posted on 12/05/2010 5:53:45 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Fleetwood:

When conservative forces in the south were arguing for separate but equal facilities for blacks during the civil rights struggle, does any version of history look back and exonerate the apes that held onto the conservative position? No!

Hey Idiot!

Those "conservatives" were democrats...AKA the KKK.

20 posted on 12/05/2010 5:55:41 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"You know why I am snob? Why I am elitist? Because liberals – or progressives are right. You are wrong. End of story. "

Enjoy that 9.8% unemployment, genius.

21 posted on 12/05/2010 5:56:47 PM PST by ari-freedom (Happy Chanuka!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“What do you think- two years out; whom do you see winning the Presidential election in 2012?”

Palin, hands down.


22 posted on 12/05/2010 5:56:49 PM PST by Gator113 (Sarah Palin can win, and she will win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Because the nuclear codes will then fall into the lap of a woman who thinks the earth is only 6 thousand years old...

I remember that this is exactly, almost word for word, what they said about Reagan.

26 posted on 12/05/2010 6:08:54 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am not in love with Palin, as most FReepers appear to be, and I tend to be somewhat more moderate and practical politically than most here, but it will be a cold day in hell before I ever vote for someone like Bloomberg. From Dem to Rep to Ind, yet always staunchly leftist, the man represents the worst aspects of political s today. Again, I’m no fan of Palin, but if she gets the Rep nomination, I’ll vote for her.


29 posted on 12/05/2010 6:19:59 PM PST by Wolfstar (Welcome to the theater of the absurd, where every registered Republican is a "RINO.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I would rather have Sarah Palin as President than the worse than Carter President that we have now. We don’t need a wishy washy kiss a**, who bows to other countries heads of state, & who wants to make the US a third world country. I trust Sarah more than I can throw the rest of the group who think they want to run for President in 2012 such as Huckabee & Gingrich.


33 posted on 12/05/2010 6:30:32 PM PST by jrcats (Sarah Palin's Alaska beats Obama's D.C. Disaster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; ...
Davis Fleetwood
Google
He knows nothing about history, clearly; and Fred Phelps and his fellow thugs are not conservatives, they're not even Christians; and the southern opponents of the Civil Rights Act were Democrats; liberals are not right, some are smug, all are dumb, self-righteous hypocrites; there's no such thing as a Progressive, because establishment of a single party state -- their only common denominator -- is not a progressive agenda. Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.
48 posted on 12/09/2010 5:21:51 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson