We do know more than that. For instance that the Hawaiian DNC did not certify Obama as eligible to be president because they knew he was not a natural born citizen or even that he was born in Hawaii. See here:
"Democratic Party of Hawaii Refused To Certify Obama" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXFwqUi3zR0
All we know is that you cannot cover up a Hawaii birth certificate that never existed.
Yes we do know that the State of Hawaii have violated their own rules and laws to cover up for Obama. Care to weigh in Butter? We do know that a Hawaiian Election Official says there is NO long form Hawaiian birth certificate or that Obama was born in a Hawaiian hospital.
Yes, Obama is probably hiding his birth certificate because it will show that he was named "Barry Dunham" at birth, it will show that he probably added "Hussein" to his name to get political "street cred" in Chicago black politics and it will show that the State of Hawaii considered him to be born out-of-wedlock since his father was already married in Kenya and bigamy is illegal in the U.S.
A not very likely scenario you paint. And the State of Hawaii gave Stanley Ann a divorce from Barack Obama Sr. so they did recognize the marriage as legal.
Obama’s been outed, MMM, MMM, MMM.
I sent this to LTC Lakin yesterday, just to make sure they have it. I like a fair fight.
This has always made me curious. These lawyer wanna bees & some that are actually lawyers say that a judge can grant a divorce based on a non-marriage. Just doesn't jive. Can a judge end a ‘common law’ marriage that hasn't been recorded with the court? AKA “I do” without filing any legal papers.