Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apple quietly includes malware prevention update in Mac OS X 10.6.4
Appleinsider ^ | June 18, 2010 | By Katie Marsal

Posted on 06/18/2010 6:13:52 PM PDT by Swordmaker

Apple silently updated its Snow Leopard malware protection in this week's Mac OS X 10.6.4 update, targeting a Trojan that disguises itself as iPhoto.

Though the new protection wasn't specifically listed in any of Apple's documentation accompanying Mac OS X 10.6.4, security firm Sophos discovered the update in the XProtect.plist file, which contains signatures of potential Mac threats. The new threat, dubbed HellRTS by Apple, has been distributed by hackers since April in the form of iPhoto.

Referred to as OSX/Pinhead-B by Sophos, the Trojan monitors browser activity unbeknownst to Mac users. It also makes a machine remotely accessible to the attacker, who can take complete control of the computer.

"If you did get infected by this malware then hackers would be able to send spam email from your Mac, take screenshots of what you are doing, access your files and clipboard and much more," said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant with Sophos.

Cluley took a negative response to Apple's secrecy, suggesting that the Cupertino, Calif., company should instead make note that the latest update to Snow Leopard helps to thwart a potentially dangerous Trojan.

"You have to wonder whether their keeping quiet about an anti-malware security update like this was for marketing reasons," he wrote on the company's blog.

Last September, Cluley also made note that users upgrading to Snow Leopard would see their version of Flash for Mac downgraded to an older, less secure version. Apple addressed the issue with an update a week later.

Released last August, Snow Leopard came with a built-in antimalware feature. While the previous version of Mac OS X, Leopard, flagged Internet downloads with metadata that alerted users when downloading files from the Web, Snow Leopard added an additional warning when disk images containing known malware installers are opened.

Apple released its latest update for Snow Leopard, Mac OS X 10.6.4, on Tuesday. The security and maintenance update fixed issues that could cause a Mac keyboard or trackpad to become responsive, and also resolved a problem that could prevent some Adobe Creative Suite 3 applications from opening.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: apple; ilovebillgates; iwanthim; iwanthimbad; microsoftfanboys
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 561-562 next last

1 posted on 06/18/2010 6:13:52 PM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL


2 posted on 06/18/2010 6:15:58 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

But Mac OSX is uber secure. Why on earth would they need this protection? Also why did they hide it? I wonder if their advertising that they don’t have security issues is going to bite them in the butt.


3 posted on 06/18/2010 6:17:43 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; 50mm; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; Airwinger; Aliska; ...
Security firm Sophos twigs Apple for not announcing specifically that it's OSX update does what an OS should do as a matter of course: protect the system from malware—PING!


Mac security Ping!

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

4 posted on 06/18/2010 6:17:59 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE isAAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!Apple could simply require that any iPho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Swordmaker

Oh is that the spin? Apple shouldn’t tell people what they are putting on thier computers because it’s only doing what it should.

I wonder how MS would be treated if they did such a thing...installing software without telling users. Hey wait, I bet if someone wanted to they could find several threads about such a thing and where MS got beat up pretty badly for it.

Simple fact, if they are changing my computer they should tell me what changes are being made.


6 posted on 06/18/2010 6:20:49 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

I have to hand to Swordmaker. I usually don’t get along with him because of what I see is a demonic bias towards apple. However he did post this.

Of course no matter what I say I’ll still get accused of being a troll. Must comply with the group think.


7 posted on 06/18/2010 6:22:00 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton; driftdiver
But Mac OSX is uber secure. Why on earth would they need this protection? Also why did they hide it? I wonder if their advertising that they don’t have security issues is going to bite them in the butt.

This malware is a TROJAN, a program that does exactly what it is intended to do using the intended and built in capabilities of the computer.

In this instance it masquerades as a pirate copy of iPhoto. Why anyone would NEED a pirated copy from an unknown, untrusted source is beyond understanding—especially since it's one that's available as a free Apple app easily downloadable from a safe and secure source at Apple.com!

The only vulnerability here existed in the stupidity of the user at the keyboard until Apple closed that door for this Trojan in Snow Leopard—as it has for the four other known families of Trojans in the wild. Apple is having the OS handle malware. Just as it should.

8 posted on 06/18/2010 6:32:09 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE isAAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!Apple could simply require that any iPho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

I guess we can put the whole “only Windows computers get infected by viruses/trojans/hax0rs” myth to rest...


9 posted on 06/18/2010 6:33:18 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
Even accepting the implied sarcasm tag, do you have any idea how silly your comment is? This type of malware is social engineering and has nothing to do with system security. Apple included an update that gives a warning if a user attempts to install it. If Apple hadn't included this update, you would have dissed them. They included it and you dissed them.

Since iPhoto comes with every Mac, this is a pretty narrow threat. The only people who would be affected by it would be those who for some reason decided to download iPhoto from a peer to peer network instead of using the copy they received from Apple. Sounds like it would mostly affect people with Hackintoshes.

As far as not including a press release, shrug.


10 posted on 06/18/2010 6:41:06 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker; for-q-clinton

The majority of Windows malware infections are the result of user action as well.


11 posted on 06/18/2010 6:41:34 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
Oh is that the spin? Apple shouldn’t tell people what they are putting on thier computers because it’s only doing what it should.

I wonder how MS would be treated if they did such a thing...installing software without telling users. Hey wait, I bet if someone wanted to they could find several threads about such a thing and where MS got beat up pretty badly for it.

Neither Apple nor Microsoft, or any other software publisher except open source publishers, are required to document for public consumption every alteration or inclusion they make in their operating systems or other products, nor do they.

If you think you can find such threads, post them.

12 posted on 06/18/2010 6:43:42 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE isAAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!Apple could simply require that any iPho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball; for-q-clinton

“This type of malware is social engineering and has nothing to do with system security.”

Social engineering is a very effective technique. I’ve been saying for years all you have to do is get someone to click on a link or a picture and their PC is yours.

Seems I was right. Nice shrug though.


13 posted on 06/18/2010 6:43:48 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
I guess we can put the whole “only Windows computers get infected by viruses/trojans/hax0rs” myth to rest...

Strawman. No one has said that Macs can't be invaded by a Trojan. But Snow Leopard makes it very hard.

14 posted on 06/18/2010 6:46:44 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE isAAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!Apple could simply require that any iPho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
I'm not aware of anyone with any knowledge who claims any system is immune from a Trojan. A computer is designed to run programs. If a user gives a program authority to run, it will run.

Even then, OSX and iOS ask for a confirmation and the system password before allowing a program to affect the system. Yeah, if you're determined to install malware on a Mac, you can do it, especially if you've got the system password. Accidentally running a vbs or something that turns your system into a zombie, well, I haven't run virus software on my Macs since I started using them at OSX 1 and still have never had a problem.

15 posted on 06/18/2010 6:46:51 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

And that is where over 95% of the windows viruses come from...users doing things that they shouldn’t. Like installing software that promises free porn.


16 posted on 06/18/2010 6:54:32 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

But I have had many macbots and apple zealots swear by apple and not even needing anti-virus software because mac is that secure. So it would appear as their user base grows the hackers and virus writers will start attacking them more. And then the next charleton will come along to sell their snake oil of the uber secure computer. At first it will be 100% risk free computing. And then as each layer gets beaten they’ll change the definition. Just like the macbots have done over the years. I think the latest definition of a secure OS is an OS that can’t be exploited just sitting on the network. Which by that definition windows 7 is definitely uber secure.


17 posted on 06/18/2010 6:57:32 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Windows has improved security dramatically, and since I get aggravated when people use OS9 to talk about current Macs, before I post this, please understand that yeah, I know this was a while back and Windows has improved a lot since then.

Anyway, I was working on a PC at my college when the I Love You virus came out. I never got infected, cause, as I think we agree, the biggest security problem on most systems is between the keyboard and the chair. I didn't click on the link, but every time one of the emails got into Outlook, a predictable pattern emerged. First, we'd get a frantic email from network services saying "PLEASE delete the email from [whoever] Do NOT click on the link in the email!!!! About ten seconds later, I'd get about fifty emails from faculty members who clicked on the email and had their mailbox taken over and a new flood of emails would come out. Windows fixed this flaw, but I've never run up on anything like this on a Mac. If you want to infect your system, it's possible, but the system will ask you if you're sure you want to do it and require a password.

Being familiar with both systems, user awareness is the best solution. I've never been infected on a PC or a Mac, but I find it much easier to avoid pitfalls on the Mac, and to do so without running virus software.

18 posted on 06/18/2010 6:58:49 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

It was just a matter of time. Hackers can’t resist a system.


19 posted on 06/18/2010 6:59:10 PM PDT by Cyclone59 (I ROCK, Guitar Hero said so........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Neither Apple nor Microsoft, or any other software publisher except open source publishers, are required to document for public consumption every alteration or inclusion they make in their operating systems or other products, nor do they.

If you think you can find such threads, post them.

http://windowssecrets.com/2007/09/13/01-Microsoft-updates-Windows-without-users-consent http://www.ditii.com/2007/10/25/onecare-silently-changes-automatic-updates/ http://news.softpedia.com/news/Microsoft-Secretly-Installs-Firefox-Extension-via-Windows-Update-144443.shtml Do you need more? Or will that be enough to prove my point?

20 posted on 06/18/2010 7:02:00 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 561-562 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson