Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus
The letter proving the contrary notwithstanding.

The letter proved nothing except that Lincoln asked Scott to have plans ready for after the change in presidency. Nowhere in that letter is any suggestion or request that Scott not follow Buchanan's instructions or to drag his feet in carrying out his orders. Nowhere is there any attempt to usurp power before his constitutionally mandated date.

Ever notice, rb, that every time you document a point, every time someone makes a good argument, this guy starts hitting the ROFLMAO button?

ROTFLMAO!!!!! That's what you call 'good points'?

347 posted on 03/14/2010 1:06:39 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Nowhere in that letter is any suggestion or request that Scott not follow Buchanan's instructions or to drag his feet in carrying out his orders. Nowhere is there any attempt to usurp power before his constitutionally mandated date.

Except that Scott did exactly that -- exasperating Buchanan by creating fait accompli regarding the Administration's deliberations over what to do about the forts.

That Scott busted his move at Lincoln's request, given the letter (which indicates previous communication as well) is a no-brainer.

But you're still wriggling, because this shows Lincoln interfering and laying the basis of his war policy.

356 posted on 03/14/2010 2:31:43 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson