Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Nowhere in that letter is any suggestion or request that Scott not follow Buchanan's instructions or to drag his feet in carrying out his orders. Nowhere is there any attempt to usurp power before his constitutionally mandated date.

Except that Scott did exactly that -- exasperating Buchanan by creating fait accompli regarding the Administration's deliberations over what to do about the forts.

That Scott busted his move at Lincoln's request, given the letter (which indicates previous communication as well) is a no-brainer.

But you're still wriggling, because this shows Lincoln interfering and laying the basis of his war policy.

356 posted on 03/14/2010 2:31:43 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus
Except that Scott did exactly that -- exasperating Buchanan by creating fait accompli regarding the Administration's deliberations over what to do about the forts.

So you would have us believe. Yet Scott initiated communications with Lincoln in October 1860, as evidenced by this November letter. And apparently continued his communications through November and December, as evidenced by this letter. There is no evidence that Buchanan or Floyd were unaware of the communications. Or that they objected to it. And Lincoln made it clear in his second letter that he relied on Scott to send him only information that he "deem it proper to make to me."

Lincoln didn't go behind Buchanan's back, and he wasn't planning a war. Except in your hyperactive imagination.

361 posted on 03/14/2010 3:07:40 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson