Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Aurorales

Unless the baby died - either then or later. Who would be looking at their dead relative’s birth certificate and notice that it has Obama’s alleged number?

The electronic vital stats records today have a feature where they can pair up birth and death information for individuals. It would require an even greater level of complicity by the DOH, but the DOH could have looked to see whose certificate number was available, told Obama about it, and had him request a non-certified abbreviated certificate (COLB) for that child.

I don’t know if the DOH would have gone that far. I know they’ve gone far to COVER Obama’s lies but I don’t know if they would actually be involved in STARTING the problem.

But I think it’s pretty clear that Obama used somebody else’s certificate number and/or COLB to do the forgery. So that number does belong to somebody. Probably somebody who has already died.

It would certainly explain why the DOH is so insistent on not following the rules and sending a non-certified copy of Obama’s abbreviated birth certificate. And why they guard the certficate number with their lives, even though at one point it was part of the required index data - and is now grandfathered in as public information as well.


211 posted on 02/23/2010 2:20:25 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

This is what I have been thinking as well.


217 posted on 02/23/2010 2:24:51 PM PST by Danae (Don't like our Constitution? Try living in a country with out one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion
“Who would be looking at their dead relative’s birth certificate and notice that it has Obama’s alleged number?”
___________________________________________

The problem with this is....they might. If Barry did use a dead baby's number and it is found out, all hell would break loose.
That would be outright fraud.

I don't think they want to take that chance.

220 posted on 02/23/2010 2:28:54 PM PST by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion; patlin
Who would be looking at their dead relative’s birth certificate and notice that it has Obama’s alleged number?

Exactly. That's what I said months ago and my first thought with the lines on the newspaper announcement (that or a missing ad). Out of the approx. 147 births (thanks to patlin and now someone needs to go back to the papers for the week to check) recorded each day, there's bound to be a baby who didn't make it. Even easier to steal if both mother and baby died. Fifty years later, it's likely the dad could be deceased today. Not very likely anyone would even have the records much less put two and two together. No one has come up with an original copy of the newspapers and there were thousands more of those compared to one bc.

313 posted on 02/23/2010 5:36:58 PM PST by bgill (The framers of the US Constitution established an entire federal government in 18 pages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson