Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: curiosity; butterdezillion

Okay, so logically explain how a form received on August 8th and filed - case closed - got a number higher than forms that came in three days AFTER Obama’s form got filed?

Aug 8 =/= Aug 11

Seriously, once the thing got filed they would have stuck it in a folder and that was it. The numbers preceding Barry’s would have been used already by the time the Nordyke’s rolled in three days later. So how could this be. Well either the Nordyke’s are false or the picture posted on the internet supposedly of Barry’s is a forgery.

This is NOT saying that Barry wasn’t born in Hawaii. It is simply saying that what has been posted on the internet is NOT Barry’s real COLB.

Ok so if that isn’t Obama’s REAL COLB.... then OBAMA HAS NOT PROVEN A SINGLE THING ABOUT HIMSELF AT ALL! He has NOT shown a picture of his real COLB. It’s on his campaign website, HIS fightthesmears http://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate site, which is PASSING IT OFF AS HIS.

Let me put it another way.

I am not saying he wasn’t born in Hawaii. I am saying that he has NOT shown his REAL Certificate of Live Birth. He is allowing a forgery to stand, and knows it is a forgery.

What is on the REAL COLB?

Literally, the ONLY thing he gave us regarding who he is, is the COLB on FightTheSmears set up by FactCheck.

Has ANYONE at the DOH ever certified that what is at that site is REALLY Barry’s COLB? That the NUMBERS match?? 151 1969 010641 is Barry’s Birth Certificate number??

I don’t recall anyone ever stating they had confirmation of that fact from the DOH. Is there any?


160 posted on 02/23/2010 1:16:18 PM PST by Danae (Don't like our Constitution? Try living in a country with out one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: Danae

The DOH has gone to great pains to not reveal the birth certificate number for Obama even though birth certificate number was required to be included in the publicly-available index data before UIPA was passed. The legislative history of UIPA shows that it was not meant to close access to what was already publicly-available before UIPA was passed.

IOW, the birth certificate number is a piece of information that was publicly-available and is grandfathered in for public availability.

The place it should be released is on the non-certified copy of an abbreviated birth certificate - which is required to be released to anyone who asks for it. The DOH refuses.

So Will Espero wants to punish me because I’ve asked for it and sent e-mails documenting to Okubo why she is required to give it. I won’t just let her disobey the law in peace, so I must be punished.


173 posted on 02/23/2010 1:28:47 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

To: Danae; curiosity; butterdezillion
Re: The numbers preceding Barry’s would have been used already by the time the Nordyke’s rolled in three days later. So how could this be.

Even in 1961, birth records would have been maintained by an automated system — it may have been on punched cards, or on an old IBM 1440 or 1410.

The birth registration record would have been identified by a “key.” That key is the birth registration number (or some like designator). They are assigned sequentially.

Now, I can think of ways that Obama’s number is higher than the Nordyke twins, but they would fall under the category of errors and would be 2% or 3% probability.

Obama was born at home, and his birth wasn't reported for a couple of days. He was registered in the sequence reported — after the Nordykes.

175 posted on 02/23/2010 1:32:21 PM PST by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson