It really is sort of a waste of time when I have to answer people like you that do a 5 minture google search and then post your “findings” at freerepublic and other online blogs.
I will however explain the facts for you.
I was a witness is “BARNETT vs OBAMA”. The birth certificate that I procured in Kenyan was filed in the case. And yes, as the title implies, “BARNETT vs OBAMA”, yes it was a case againts President Barack Obama. My 09.03.2009 Declaration was aslo filed in this case. I was in the Honorable Judge David O Carter’s courtroom in the witness room waiting to testify on 09.08.2009.
So stop with reporting misinformation.
As for Ory’s other cases, the “Rhodes” case that you have cited, Orly attached the same documents to that case as well, at a later date. BY THE WAY, the Rhodes case was ALL ABOUT OBAMA. The soldier refused to deploy to war because the soilder refused to acknowledge Obama as having power to command the arms forces because Obama has not proven that he is eligible to hold office of President of the United States.
Do you get it now??? I hope so. I also hope that you will have enough integrity to admit when you’ve made a mistake rather than reply with some jab which explains nothing more than it’s your story and you are sticking to it. Don’t let your pride get in the way.
By the way the only other case which I hace testified in RIVERNIDER vs US BANK. It was a back door for getting some facts onto court record that can be used in another federal court case. I was there to testify for Charles Lincoln because Orly Taitz was attempting to smear Lincoln. I personal knowledge of their work agreement and their friendship.
As for your mention of the Liberi vs Taitz case. I HAVE NEVERT TESTIFIED in that case. Perhaps Phil Berg and Liberi have now attached my declaration and my affidavit to that case which they or any other lawyer has the right to do once record of it was already made in another court.
Long stort short, DONT ATTEMPT TO STATE HERE THAT I WAS NOT A WITNESS IN FEDERAL COURT REGARDING OBAMA.
Again, Pamele Barnett vs Barack Obama. Can you read that? Go google search it or whatever it is that you yourself do in you “great research”.
And you might also want to review the “Rhodes” case. IT IS ALL ABOUT OBAMA.
Report back when you can admit that you made an error in youe “findings”.
No, you weren't. You did not take the witness stand. Whether you were in the courtroom, or witness room or out in the parking lot has no bearing on the case. You were not called as a witness. (Don't make me quote Congressman Joe Wilson here.)
I gave you the benefit of the doubt in assuming you testified in Liberi v. Taitz, but now we can narrow your Federal Court testimony down to one case, Rivernider v. U.S. Bank, which is totally unrelated to eligibility. Thanks for clarifying that point.
Orly attached the same documents to that case as well, at a later date.
Your Kenyan BC and affidavit were recorded on the docket of both courts on the same date: Sept. 4, 2009.
You were never a witness in any court in an Obama elibility case.