No, you weren't. You did not take the witness stand. Whether you were in the courtroom, or witness room or out in the parking lot has no bearing on the case. You were not called as a witness. (Don't make me quote Congressman Joe Wilson here.)
I gave you the benefit of the doubt in assuming you testified in Liberi v. Taitz, but now we can narrow your Federal Court testimony down to one case, Rivernider v. U.S. Bank, which is totally unrelated to eligibility. Thanks for clarifying that point.
Orly attached the same documents to that case as well, at a later date.
Your Kenyan BC and affidavit were recorded on the docket of both courts on the same date: Sept. 4, 2009.
You were never a witness in any court in an Obama elibility case.
Pride getting your way isn’t it?
Dont take it out on everyone. Where’s your integrity?
Maybe you should check out the definition of what a witness in federal court (or any court) is.
I’ve filed declarations and affidavits in federal court, I’ve been in the courtrooms waiting to take the stand and I did take the stand in the Rivernider case.
And for the record, BARNETT vs OBAMA is the very first Obama case that I was witness in.
I have an idea here, why don’t you get a law degree and then come back here to freerepublic and post an agology for all the errors you’ve made in your posts today.
I know your type, I’ve run across many in the last several months. You run your mouth on and on and on. When someone finally calls you out for your bs you then take the, “It’s my story and I’m sticking to it.”
I’ve called out scores of you old halfrate losers. Where’s your intergrity? When you’re wrong you are wrong.
I wouldn’t be at shocked if you are some middle aged guy sitting all alone in disabilty paid apartment. That’s what happens to most know-it-alls. You know why??? Because noone likes them. That’s why you probably don’t have a wife and never did and never will.
Best advise to you and those like you is to sign up for Obama’s utopia brave new world. You guys will fit right in.
Don’t worry about replying to me. I dont have time to read ocmments from “know it alls”. You’d find a reason to argue no matter what anyone said.
Respectfully,
Lucas D. Smith
And one last note to the old limp di-k - no wife - know-it-all browardchad.
My 09.03.2009 declartion and the birth certificate of Obama was filed in the BARNETT vs OBAMA case. It was filed in 09.03.2009 or 09.04.2010.
Recorded in the Rhodes case as well (as you agree with).
The Rhodes case too was all about Obama being ineligible to hold office of President of the US of A. (I see that you failed to man up to the fact that you made an error when claiming that the Rhodes case has nothing to do with Obama)
My declaration and the Obama birth certificate is filed in BOTH cases. But yet you claim I wasn’t a witness in the case??? Are you off your rocker or what? Opps... I forgot, you’re just an old limp di-ck know-it-all.
Old loser. Find some intergrity.