[Bob J]

“‘Palinista’ is a derisive term.”

Why is that?

[McGruff]

You need a rest, Bob. Seek help. I’m serious.

3 posted on Friday, January 08, 2010 12:27:49 PM by Jim Robinson

You should listen more Bob.

[Bob J]

At this point I would point out that at 114 posts save one there has not been a legitimate answer to my original question which itself was legitimate and pertinent.

The reason for this is obvious to me, most Palin supporters hide their heads in the sand preferring to believe in marshmallow castles and strawberry moats (and messiahs) as opposed to hard realities of modern politics.

[jla]

To 114 - Don't be deliberately obtuse.
Here, this will placate you -

Queen Sarah

Her loyal tribe is at her beck and call

[deport]

Off topic in some respects to your thread but a question.

Do you see any similarities amongst the freepers and their actions say between the 1999/2000 candidate support and the current candidate support being displayed?

[RonDog]

“‘Palinista’ is a derisive term.”

Why is that?

LOL!

Well, for for ONE thing, it is based on the "Sandinistas" -- who were the BAD guys, back in the day...

From CIA.gov:

Sandinista National Liberation Front,
Marxist organization founded with Cuban help