Footprints are not that dumb an idea. An infant’s fingerprint is not well developed at birth but a foot print is much more so. Once the print is created, it does not change whether the print is on the finger or the foot. I wish that all birth certificates in the world today had a self-proving feature like a footprint which would reduce the rampant fraud that exists in this area. Stop and think about it, how else can you link a document to the individual who claims a birth certificate is his offical document.
IIRC the orginal use of footprints was to make sure the babies were not switch.
I didnt say it ws dumb...footprints belong only to that one person..They could help in identfying an infant...
But they were meant to be a keepsake...not a legal document...
If I could not use it to get my child into kindergarten, why would it be accepted for POTUS ???
Anyway the foot print of a 48? year old man is different than a brand new baby...
I’m sure there are ways to link those...
BTW have you ever tried to join a historical society ??? To prove you are connected to your ancestors ???
You need much more proof than it apparantly takes to be POTUS..