Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier

It’s not a “problem” for anyone who understands the clear language and intent of the Framers.


It most certainly IS a problem for anyone who thinks that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible to be the 44th President of the United States under the provisions of Article Two Section One and that he shouldn’t have been sworn in by Chief Justice John Roberts.


8,371 posted on 08/08/2009 10:54:31 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8320 | View Replies ]


To: jamese777
It most certainly IS a problem for anyone who thinks that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible...

I think we're heading toward a mis-communication here. I don't think that Zero is eligible to hold the office of President under our Constitution.

Yes, "it's a problem" for every patriot who understands the clear meaning of the Framer's intent, in that we must find a way to enforce the proscriptions of our founding document.

8,393 posted on 08/09/2009 9:54:01 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8371 | View Replies ]

To: jamese777
It most certainly IS a problem for anyone who thinks that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible Thought Police in da house...
8,399 posted on 08/09/2009 11:01:10 AM PDT by GregNH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8371 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson