I’m almost starting to think that WND is backing off for some unspoken reason; maybe threats, maybe to give the BC issue time. If 0bama’s team think they’ve debunked the Kenyan BC, it gives people doing work more time.
The docs cannot be compared and people at WND can’t be that stupid to think comparing apples and oranges makes any sense.
I’m sure they have some unique motivations for what they say and when they report it. But they alos previously stated they had Kenyan docs that match the format of the Obamarrhoid’s version. Are they confused or sowing confusion?
Maybe because the FBI is involved.
lj - The inaccuracies at WND bother me, too. While what you suggest is possible, I really don’t think libs care much what WND publishes. What he is presenting is confusing and disturbing to the conservatives that read his site and that’s bad enough, especially on top of Coulter, etc. poking fun at the “birthers”. (Ann’s article dumping on the birthers is on WND, too.)
Does anyone here have the ability to get Farrah to correct his stories and the images he is using? Neither article containing the wrong facts and pics has the ability to post comments so the only way to change it is for Farrah to do something.