lj - The inaccuracies at WND bother me, too. While what you suggest is possible, I really don’t think libs care much what WND publishes. What he is presenting is confusing and disturbing to the conservatives that read his site and that’s bad enough, especially on top of Coulter, etc. poking fun at the “birthers”. (Ann’s article dumping on the birthers is on WND, too.)
Does anyone here have the ability to get Farrah to correct his stories and the images he is using? Neither article containing the wrong facts and pics has the ability to post comments so the only way to change it is for Farrah to do something.
Well, I am hoping that Farah is creating this confusion for a good reason. If it is merely mistakes, they are fairly egregious mistakes for an online news site.
And I disagree with one point - 0bama and his team of fiends do indeed care about the opposition. Did you see the article from Canada Free Press (I think that’s the name) about 0bama’s team shutting a talk show host up with legal threats before the election? And IIRC more than one news venue or host. 0bama means to shut up the opposition entirely. The are concerned about voices of opposition. They’re trying to make all opposition look orchestrated, funded by rich backers, violent, wingnuts, racist, something. Painting the opposition like this rather than ever addressing the concerns is standard policy for leftists in general and 0bama in particular.
I think he is very concerned about what WND writes, even websites like FR - note the huge number of recent trolls on FR. They have teams all over the internet. ANd now we’re supposed to send email addys and phone numbers to the White House of people who oppose Hellth Care.