Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: TheBigIf
They both have the same exact stain on them. Is it posible that we are seeing photos of the document from two completly different time frames?

I think the bottom one, with the black background, has been altered to remove the striped background table cloth (or whatever) and the "artist" who was attempting to do so was using the wrong Photoshop tool to do it, either deliberately, or inadvertently, or ignorantly. The "tear" appears to be a "tool" slip... sloppy work.

699 posted on 08/02/2009 5:22:26 AM PDT by Swordmaker (remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 656 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker
I think the bottom one, with the black background, has been altered...

No kidding. The tear is too thick to be a normal tear. There's a sizable vertical chunk missing.

713 posted on 08/02/2009 5:24:44 AM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 699 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

I am a little late to this thread and I quickly browsed the 700 some posts. I noted Dunham divorced Barack Sr in March 1964. The document in question states February 1964. Could this be a document from the divorce proceedings?


760 posted on 08/02/2009 5:38:46 AM PDT by carcraft (Pray for our Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 699 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson