Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: NJ_Tom
mombasa.jpg is not the original. It is the modified (47O44 for 47644, E.F. Lavender for K.F. Lavender, etc.) version that was swapped for the original. The original is the one whose header does not contain references to image editing software (so far, besides Adobe, I have seen MediaOne in headers). The one with the 4764 number is the only one I've seen that meets this requirement.

Sigh

Tom, it IS a copy of the original JPG file that I made. The only true and correct image has "E.F. Lavender" and an "O" not a "6". The "K" and "6" are artifacts created by the JPEG algorithms averaging the anti-aliasing information on the original image capture I did from Orly's FLASH script display. The "K" and "6" images are illusions and NEVER existed.

6,957 posted on 08/05/2009 2:52:37 PM PDT by Swordmaker (remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6943 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker
01010111 01010100 01000110 00111111

:>)
6,958 posted on 08/05/2009 3:04:23 PM PDT by ComputerGuy (Williams/Sowell 2012 -or- Sowell/Williams 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6957 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
The only true and correct image has "E.F. Lavender" and an "O" not a "6".

Swordmaker: You have WAY, WAY more patience than I do. I would have stopped explaining the E vs. K issue about 100 Swordmaker posts ago. If people aren't willing to have at least a glancing look at the thread(s) (yes, they are getting very long) then I'm not sure they have an explanation coming.

But, as long as you are willing to walk another mile ...

6,960 posted on 08/05/2009 3:06:48 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6957 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

I pulled the damn contentious things.

If somebody wants them, they can mail me.

The stupid “messed up one” is already being posted on other blogs and I can’t find a way to inform the blog owners of the error.

I made 2 comments on the blog asking them to pull it [18 comments already existed] and when I went back, ALL the comments were gone but the image is still there.

WTH is up with that?


7,004 posted on 08/05/2009 4:42:08 PM PDT by Salamander (Like acid and oil on a madman's face, reason tends to fly away..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6957 | View Replies ]

To: All

Regarding pence and cents, you know what I am thinking? Suppose I wanted to make a forgery of the birth certificate. What would I do? I would certainly do research regarding the form itself, the coat of arms, the stamp, the paper, the typewriter, etc... But it would never occur to me to print the price on the form. Why? Because I’ve never seen a price printed directly on a document, so I would think of putting it here.

By the way, yesterday someone made a very good comment about the pence (I wish I remembered what post or which thread). It was historically common in England to charge 7 and a half shillings for all the documents. It was a standard price. This amount used to be called an “angel” at some point. This person even quoted what might have been a literary text. So it’s quite possible that Kenya borrowed this quaint tradition.


7,025 posted on 08/05/2009 5:36:08 PM PDT by Mimi3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6957 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson