Ah.....
What Polarik is saying there is, from his point of view true. He wants to see a certified LITERAL COPY, like a photo or xerox, of the original record. You can order up such a thing from the Hawaii authorities, and BanBam has not done so, for whatever reason.
But from Kenya, what you see is all you are EVER going to get, short of a government to government intervention. The Kenyan document we see is an abstract, just as is the Hawaii “Certification of Live Birth”, it is not the primary birth record, or a photocopy of it. Perhaps That makes it “bogus” in Polarik’s eyes. From the context of his comment it seems likely that is his point.
My view is that all we need is to have the Kenyan document authenticated.
I think that anyone who works with graphics would notice that the Kenyan document, as presented, shows serious signs of being fiddled with...
The pixels around the lettering are a bit of a tip-off.
Then again the obots will insist that the Hawaii document presented online is genuine even though it has the same pixel effect around it’s lettering.
The Australian one has some of the same effect, though it is much more hidden. As presented, I think both images (Kenyan vs Australian) are tampered.
The reasons for the fraudulent Australian document are obvious.
Perhaps the Kenyan Document I am witnessing is a result of o-bot tampering... Or ... Maybe Taitz and co are smarter than the obots could ever imagine. They may know exactly what they are doing.
I hope so.