Replies

I think that anyone who works with graphics would notice that the Kenyan document, as presented, shows serious signs of being fiddled with...

The pixels around the lettering are a bit of a tip-off.

Then again the obots will insist that the Hawaii document presented online is genuine even though it has the same pixel effect around it’s lettering.

The Australian one has some of the same effect, though it is much more hidden. As presented, I think both images (Kenyan vs Australian) are tampered.

The reasons for the fraudulent Australian document are obvious.

Perhaps the Kenyan Document I am witnessing is a result of o-bot tampering... Or ... Maybe Taitz and co are smarter than the obots could ever imagine. They may know exactly what they are doing.

I hope so.

Try me on this. If someone is going to go to all the trouble to shop a picture with a table cloth in it why not print the document out on a VERY good color laser printer and then take a picture? WOW all the spooge is gone. I have seen analysis on other sites that think the pixelation was caused by the camera “clearing up” the area.

What you see in the Kenya BC surrounding the text is referred to a text halo. It a problem with Jpeg images.
The reason you don’t see it as much in the Australian BC is because of the format — png.

It has something to do about how the compression software deals with the image background around the letters.