I’m not an expert at looking at docs and determining their authenticity, but some here say that there are a lot of problems with the aussie doc. When the text is viewed with magnification, it’s completely straight, aligned perfectly, etc., but the paper below it is wavy.
Almost obviously, both can’t be real. When we saw the aussie doc, we assumed that the aussie doc was real, and that would automatically make the kenyan doc fake. After a few hours of looking at the aussie doc, people are saying that the aussie doc looks faker than the kenyan doc. Which puts the kenyan doc back in action.
I have no idea what the truth is, but the kenyan doc is back in action.
I was thinking today that the Aussie doc might be the fake one. THEN, I read the story about Hillary going to Kenya.
Hmmm, thought I. Why would she be going to Kenya if that were a fake BC?
Watch the opposition. They often give away the game.
The biggest problem with the Kenyan document is the ‘4s. 6d.’ (4 shillings and 6 pence) in the top left-hand corner. However, as a discussion on the other thread pointed out, Kenya uses (and used) cents not pence. Unless there is an explanation for this then, regardless of the status of the Bomford certificate, the Kenyan document must be a forgery and remains ‘out of action’.