Yes, it is. Now we need to do the FR thing and verify whether or not all this is on the level. With those specifics, it may be possible to either refute or (even better) not be able to refute the claim based on those specifics.
We need to look at document font (was that typewriter font around, what machine, etc.) and verify whether the people were in those positions at the time of the documents genesis (provided it is genuine). While this will not incontravertably prove the document nor the information therein to be genuine, it will demonstrate whether or not it could be.
Although a preponderance of evidence is not sufficient to remove reasonable doubt, the absence of disproving evidence would crank the heat up on the issue and further damage credibility in the Obama camp and in the MSM, with the exception of those who give the issue creedence.
I am taking a wait and see attitude with this one. We have a lot of work to do.
The hospital is there, now, when was it constructed?