Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier
Has this actually been verified? I read over a week ago that moonbats were planting false warnings about her site being infected, when it was not. She's also got a debunking message up about this on the site.

I am not running Windows, so I am not running any Windows scanners and I am not personally seeing any local scanner warnings.

However, the Google message seems to me to be specific enough to warrant calling the Taitz site infected:

What happened when Google visited this site?
Of the 12 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 4 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2009-08-01, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 2009-08-01.

Malicious software includes 5 scripting exploit(s). Successful infection resulted in an average of 2 new process(es) on the target machine.

Malicious software is hosted on 3 domain(s), including cybercrime-protection.cn/, security-alerts.cn/, mcafee-malware.com/.

1 domain(s) appear to be functioning as intermediaries for distributing malware to visitors of this site, including security-alerts.cn/.

This site was hosted on 1 network(s) including AS6245 (NETWORK).

Could Google be mistaken? Yes, they certainly could. But I think the odds are good enough that there is a problem that I don't hesitate to call it infected.

324 posted on 08/02/2009 3:34:41 AM PDT by snowsislander (NRA -- join today! 1-877-NRA-2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies ]


To: snowsislander

Orly said that Google is misidentifying her website as malicious and has threatened to add them to the racketeering lawsuit.


334 posted on 08/02/2009 3:37:00 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]

To: snowsislander
Could Google be mistaken? Yes, they certainly could. But I think the odds are good enough that there is a problem that I don't hesitate to call it infected.

Thanks for the data. Just to be safe, I'm going to run Malwarebytes anti-malware program before I shut down.

468 posted on 08/02/2009 4:12:40 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]

To: snowsislander

Malicious software is hosted on 3 domain(s), including mcafee-malware.com ?

Google is reporting Mcafee scanning of the site.
Clams Mcafee has malware!!

Rotflmao
GOOGLE lies!

http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/orlytaitzesq.com


539 posted on 08/02/2009 4:36:54 AM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]

To: snowsislander

Site itself may not be infected but just has some javascript or something like that, posted by some adversary, which just redirects browsers to one of those malware sites. What it really means is that she needs to maintain better control of what is being posted at her site. She should probably hire an expert for that, but it should not be complicated.


922 posted on 08/02/2009 6:29:01 AM PDT by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson