[Paradox]

I wondered where they were early this morning but hasn't this been a nice pleasant thread without them. ;)

I guess its just must funner to listen to the echo's in the chamber...

I think most non-birther freepers like myself are just waiting for a smoking gun.

[sissyjane]

I’m waiting for someone other than Alan Keyes to take control of this issue. I frankly think he’s nuts. Flame away! I’ll ignore it...

[Windflier]

I guess its just must funner to listen to the echo's in the chamber...

I think most non-birther freepers like myself are just waiting for a smoking gun.

Then you may simply be in the agnostic camp, which is reasonable. Withholding judgment until satisfactory, iron-clad evidence is in hand, is something that is entirely your right to do.

Others have looked over the long trail of circumstantial evidence and have come to the conclusion that the likelihood of fraud is so overwhelming, based on the evidence at hand, that they're willing to assume Obama's guilt until he proves otherwise.

Yet others are in the opposite camp, and are unwilling to admit any (or very little) of the circumstantial evidence at hand, but are actively advocating for Obama's innocence, using much the same standard as the agnostic camp.

I don't personally begrudge anyone their personal viewpoint or conclusions, but it does strike me as odd that some posters expend so much time and energy attempting to shut down the entire investigation here.

[Windflier]

I guess its just must funner to listen to the echo's in the chamber...

I think most non-birther freepers like myself are just waiting for a smoking gun.

Then you may simply be in the agnostic camp, which is reasonable. Withholding judgment until satisfactory, iron-clad evidence is in hand, is something that is entirely your right to do.

Others have looked over the long trail of circumstantial evidence and have come to the conclusion that the likelihood of fraud is so overwhelming, based on the evidence at hand, that they're willing to assume Obama's guilt until he proves otherwise.

Yet others are in the opposite camp, and are unwilling to admit any (or very little) of the circumstantial evidence at hand, but are actively advocating for Obama's innocence, using much the same standard as the agnostic camp.

I don't personally begrudge anyone their personal viewpoint or conclusions, but it does strike me as odd that some posters expend so much time and energy attempting to shut down the entire investigation here.