(This may be addressed upthread, haven’t read all 1700 posts yet.)
“So maybe there never was a BC in Hawaii and when the divorce happened, she needed the Kenyan BC to get the Hawaiian COLB.”
My theory has been 18yr old Stanley left Kenya without a BC, and as you said her divorce attorney recommended she obtain one. The fastest most economical way would have been to have Sr. obtain it.
“What if this is found to be legitimate?”
That assumes Rahm was not completely effective in any attempt to sanitize the records. The logs of any government “escorts” accompanying Rahm would be an interesting read.
“What if the officials in Mombasa confirm this? Then what? “
If a U.S. court rules the document is authentic it will put Congress on notice that it has a duty to correct a Constitutional duty that it overlooked on January 8, 2009.
It will either correct that defect or the American public will realize its in the bag.
(See my About Page.)
Orly is going to London to look at the Colonial records because when Obama was born, Kenya was still a part of the British Empire. There is no need to go to Kenya. She is verifying the original entry of his birth in 1961, not the copy of 1964. Does that make any sense?
The records in Kenya are too likely to have been tampered with and would be useless.
[If a U.S. court rules the document is authentic it will put Congress on notice that it has a duty to correct a Constitutional duty that it overlooked on January 8, 2009.
It will either correct that defect or the American public will realize its in the bag.]
Actually, I think our best course is not impechment per se, but to so cripple the Obama administration that they can’t pursue any of their communist plots. If the Kenyan story is correct, then it means endless litigation because everything Obama has signed would be put into question. I’m hoping for a nasty, brutish, slow death to hobble everything the Democrats do.