Like what? Maya Soetoro spilling her guts to the world that her brother's a fraud, and that she has his original long form bc to prove it?
Clinton was busted on the strength of the possibility of his DNA being on a stained blue dress. Was that enough evidence for you at the time, or did you require a higher standard of proof to convince you that maybe, just maybe there was something to it?
Understand, that's all we're doing here. We're seeking the conclusive evidence that will confirm, or dispel the preponderance of circumstantial evidence against Obama.
In the meantime, we'd be morons not to acknowledge the very real questions about Obama's eligibility. The track of incidents so far in this case bear all the telltale signs of fraud. Common horse sense says that where there's smoke, there's fire, so it is our duty to keep a sharp eye on developments in this case, and yes, most of us will continue to discuss it, whether certain people object, or not.
If you honestly believe that there's nothing to this issue, then by all means, be our guest to ignore these threads.
No; the tests did take place. And proved that there was a tiny chance the DNA came from anyone else.