Replies

...I did NOT notice before that the documents had different handwriting. It’s crucial that BHO Sr. seems never to have mentioned that son—not to his friends in Hawaii, not to the newspaper reporters who wrote the stories about him, not to the people we see him partying with in photos, not on these documents, even just weeks after the alleged birth. We do have the tales told by the Kenyan “relatives” who claim to remember him carrying around a photo of little Barry.

You always were a smart cookie. I've said as much many times. Unless we see the photograph he reportedly carried around, we won't know who his son was, will we?

One very astute member of our team, a long time ago, made a comment I will never forget.

DON'T FORGET THERE WILL BE UNWILLING PARTICIPANTS IN THIS DECEPTION.

I thought of that again today when I read that while he was at Harvard, he told his associates that he had visited his son SEVERAL TIMES. Obviously, the son he visited several times wasn't in Hawaii.

“I thought of that again today when I read that while he was at Harvard, he told his associates that he had visited his son SEVERAL TIMES. Obviously, the son he visited several times wasn’t in Hawaii.”

I would not be inclined to believe anything BHO Sr. ever said, so I would regard any claim that he visited any son with suspicion and would doubt that he visited either of his two sons on the record, (Barry and Roy) while at Harvard.

There is no evidence that any other son of his existed particularly a son by an Asian mother named Roman Obama as claimed in the Mal-Val narrative (a son being insinuated as having been visited by Sr. while he was at Harvard)

BTW, On Aug. 17, 1962 Sr. did acknowledge son Roy Obama, but not Barry on page 27 of the FOIA docs in his own hand. He claimed to be married on that date, but omitted the wife’s name.