Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Yes, that was made clear later in the thread.
Sarcasm wasn’t really necessary, was it? While you’re at it, how about some supporting evidence to your claim?
Yeah.
Truth will out, eventually, I suppose.
1964 wasn't exactly the stone age. The printing press was invented in the 1400's, and was pretty advanced by 1964. You might have a point if you were talking about 1864, but the technology to print the blank document exactly as you see it was certainly there in 1964.
So this is a suit filed for Alan Keyes?
Though it's hard to imagine someone would make that mistake again.
Time will tell
Perhaps. But, since I have never lived there, nor have I ever needed to know what the “official” language was, I readily acknowledge my ignorance regarding this.
I’ve been waiting with bated breath.
>Look carefully. It’s not a birth certificate, but a “Certified Copy of Registration of Birth”. Similar to a COLB in the US.<
Are you sure of that meaning in kenya? or the UK?
Is there a source please?
What a minefield. If this document turns out to be bogus, we'll all end up looking like Dan Rather who screamed about planted-on-purpose, fabricated evidence.
In the beginning I leaned toward thinking this entire story was deflection from the real tragedy of our tanking economy and the socialistic take-over.
But there's too much redacted information on this guy for us not to assume he's hiding plenty.
Yet all Obama has to do is hire some "experts" to certify this BC as a fraud. Even with the internet, all we know is what we're shown.
Astounding, isn't it, that these questions were ignored during the election? We really are being governed by a third-world hunta.
British Crown Colony.
First, I am not touting... I would know if I was touting. However, WND has come out and said the form is the same as that issued at this exact time in history. This would be one hell of a forgery, but everyone is treating it as possibly just that. Nevertheless, it is authentic enough added to the already known information based on a number of eye witness accounts from BO's own family, to get to reasonable doubt.
People who say Stanley Ann did visit Kenya, had BO and left.
This provides a reason for the unreasonable behavior of BO in not releasing the long form B.C. in Hawaii and though it cannot be counted at this point as legal evidence, it certainly can be counted a a major challenge to provide contrary evidence like a real long form B.C. from Hawaii, and the other missing records to see if a reasonable alternative story can be constructed.
No, it's from Ed Hale. ;o)
No.
There was a YouTube video (now removed) of high school classmate Susan Black, who recall Ann’s visit with a newborn called Barry in late summer ‘61 when he was just a few weeks old. She said that Ann asked for help changing the baby’s diaper.
There have been attempts to find a marriage record for Obama and Dunham, and Obama Jr. even says in his book that it is “murky.” The divorce decree lists a Feb. ‘61 date of marriage.
If so, they may well have been “married” in Kenya, where polygamy is legal.
I’ve read where the national language was Kiswahili, but upon obtaining independence in 1963, English became the official language.
Not as advanced as a 600 dpi laser.
No problem.
I’m Canadian, so probably know more about British colonies, as we were one for many years.
My next question is who is authorized to arrest a fraud occupying the White House and would they do it?
I’d vote for the head of the FBI and ex-Marine, Robert Mueller.
I vote for the Border Patrol, if he was born in Kenya throw the illegal alien into the back of the bus like little Elian at gunpoint! Love to see that pic splattered all over the world!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.